User talk:Cajek/Archive11

Regarding UN:REQ listing for Tetris effect

The reason I posted Tetris effect to Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles has to do with my edit summary here. Okay, so I acknowledge that that's an anonymous user whose edit I was fixing up, but I was just trying to be nice and carry out the appropriate procedures. Is there any way I might be able to file this request "properly"? Pentium5dot1 02:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You know what I think UN:REQ is? A place where ideas go: any ideas at all. I was in the wrong, and I think you should put Tetris Effect back in the game section.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 02:11)

Why, hello, sir!

I must say, you look intelligent. Perhaps you'd like to partake in some of my Miracle Tonic? Guaranteed to cure what ails ya! Got a cold? Going bald? High mortgage rates? No problem for my miracle tonic!

	The Led Balloon has awarded you with a FREE* case of Honest Jim's patented Miracle Tonic.
	*Not actually free. Side effects may include just about any horrible diseases we can come up with.

Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:08, Dec 4

I'm power crazed

I saw you archiving your talk page, and was about to ban you for blanking Cajek's talk page....You see what I mean?!?! :) ~ 19:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Dude! That would be rockin'! Being banned makes you hardcore!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 19:38)

Was that satisfactory? ~ 19:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

That was faaaar more than satisfactory! After being in prison for that long, I'll never archive my talk page again! I'll only archive other people's! ...was that the lesson?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 20:03)

YES! ALWAYS ARCHIVE OTHER PEOPLE's PAGES! Ermmm....I got confused....hold on...~ 20:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

AND I'LL ADD VANITY TO ANY ARTICLE WHO'S NAME STARTS WITH "CAJ"!!!11!!11ELEVEN :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 20:11)

There's only one, and it's Cajun. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:16, Dec 4

YES! MAKE SURE YOU DO THAT! ~ 20:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

THEN CAN I BLANK USERPAGES??!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 20:13)

ONLY IF IT'S OTHER PEOPLE'S PAGES! ~ 20:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

OH, OH GOD I'M HAVING A BAN-GASM!!!11   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 20:17)

Template:Article count

You are supposed to create the bibliography page. That's kinda the point of the template.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, uh, I don't know about that. I thought it was supposed to tell people how many articles you have...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 02:49)

Don't do it Cajek, it's a trap! DON'T CREATE THAT SUBPAGE! They try to lure you in with their shiny red links, tricking you into creating a bibliography subpage, and then they take you into a dark alley and rape you! All because you created a subpage! It's true! My uncle.... he was tricked....beware...BEWARE!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:50, Dec 5

Something's telling me that it's a trick and that I should beware. Something very loud and adopterish.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 02:58)

Wanna hear something cool? Led, you're gonna want to listen too, because I'm only saying this once. I'm Led's uncle. That's right, I am the uncle of TheLedBalloon. TheLedBalloon is, therefore, my nephew. He has two dads, and one uncle; me. Crap, that was four times. Damn.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

PARDON ME LJLEGO! You seems to have a short memory there mate, you're not Led's uncle, you're his brother! Sheesh....How quickly those kids forget..../sniff ~ 20:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Mordillo's my gramppy!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 20:56)

What was it like getting raped in a dark alley all because you put a template on your userpage? Was it cool?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:17)

Is it physically possible to have an uncle younger than me? Also, how's your bum? See I heard you made a subpage, and well... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:21, Dec 5

(Innocent whistle) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:24 Dec 05, 2007

VANDAL, VANDAL! BAN ALERT, BAN ALERT WOOP WOOP   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:25)

Yeah, you should check his contribs too. Major spamming today, and no block at all! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:27 Dec 05, 2007

I would block him, but I'm not technically an admin. Ask Mordillo to ban that asshole. He's real good at banning!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:44)

I put a pointy star on his talk page. It might cut him. That'll show the bastard. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw! He deserves it! Physically... and spiritually...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:53)

BTW Boomer, guess who hasn't done a review in a very very long time? YOU.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 03:53)

(Innocent whistle) Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

R.E. : P.E.E.

yeah... as soon as I stop procrastinating I'll make it better :P my one gripe with the review was yew saying "I was laughing all the way through" and then giving humour a rating of 5. =/
And sure, whore away! =P ~Fag x FS

Some advice on Pees maybe?

He Cajek. What do you think about Why?:Does Christopher Meloni not have an emmy yet? being on pee-review and on VFH at the same time? For me that's not really playing the game. If you think it's good enough for VFH (which it might be) then should you be filling up pee-review with it also? If everyone who put something up for VFH also added it to pee-review we would drown in our own... Well you get my question, just wondered what your thoughts were. Enjoy your urinary relief. MrN 16:24, Dec 5

Also, do you know where I can find a list of all my old pees? I'm thinking of adding them to my page somewhere or something... The "reviewed" section only goes back so far... MrN 16:25, Dec 5

1. Hey hey MrN, I'm glad you're back reviewing stuff. Take a look at Category:Reviewed for basically all the reviews ever, I think. Go edit the dpl list on Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Reviewed Pee to include more stuff. It's kinda technical, but there's a way to do it. Also (sidelining) check out your Cajek points (trademark Cajek, 2007) on User:Cajek/Pee. If you want a specific reason why your score is the way it is, 99% of the time it's because your review was simply too short (I do that, too believe it or not).   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 19:30)
2. I have normal on pee review while it's on VFH by accident. On that kind of thing I would say give them the benefit of the doubt and if they're on VFH and pee on the same time just close the review and give a reason. You know what I'm sayin? I should close Normal too.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 19:30)

Thanks for voting

	MrN9000 has awarded you with this rather nicely coloured boxy thing to thank you for voting and helping to get The Color Problem featured on the front page.
	*Please do not mention the colour/color problem. It's not an issue. Really.

You old piss artist you... MrN 17:40, Dec 6

What's your problem??

You wanted your article on 'why your house is mad' reviewed. I read it and reviewed it. I'm also a noob, so I agree that the review may not have been the best of the best. But there is NO reason to delete it and then put down why you got rid of it as 'rolls eyes' and leave it at that. It was my first review, and you crush into the ground like Hitler crushed the Jews. Care to explain why??--Garionepsilon 20:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Passing by, Led mentions Godwin's Law, then rambles on his way. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:45, Dec 6

That TheLedBalloon guy is right Nazi, he's just like Hitler. MrN 20:54, Dec 6

I'm right, though? He wanted it reviewing, there's no law stopping people such as me submitting a review. The fact he didn't like it's not here nor there, it's critisicm. Get over it. I didn't say anything bad, I just did a review saying it was good and it pointed out some improvements. It's not my fault he's a real *string of beeping interted here*--Garionepsilon 20:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

That Cajek character. Tsk Tsk. ~ 20:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

/me pushes my way past all the weirdos talking to some other guy on my talk page Just review it again more in depth. I don't care if you hate it, just tell me WHY!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 20:57)

Yeah, I think he wants suggestions. That's kind of the point of pee review, you know. People don't just want to know how they did, they want to know how they could do better. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:03, Dec 6

Pushes myself back in again, just for the shear hell of it... I think, if I may speculate to say Mr Cajek. That perhaps you were a little upset with the depth in which your article had been reviewed... We are VERY much in favour of anyone doing pee-reviews. Hell, few do. I think Cajek is currently the most active and proficient at the art of pissing and so his opinion is right now pretty much the law around here... If you do choose to do more pee-reviews Garionepsilon, please try to make a contribution which will genuinely help the person who put it there. If your just going to say things like "work on it more" that's not really going to help much. I would suggest that you take a look at some of the reviews which Cajek has done and use them as an example of the kinda work which you should put into doing a pee-review. MrN 21:12, Dec 6

Hear hear! Don't take my reverts personally, Garionepsilon. Listen to MrN9000, he's got the right idea praising me on my own talk page.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:14)

That Cajekguy is right Nazi, he's just like Hitler... MrN 21:15, Dec 6

If Hitler's a 9, I'm a 10. In terms of sex appeal, I mean. Don't get all defensive on me.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:16)

Come on now, be honest... Bet you had to look up what "Godwin's Law" was... I didn't. Honest... MrN 21:21, Dec 6

My adopter just rushed in here, made a law, and then exited just as swiftly. Led is a very powerful and mysterious figure, and I've learned to deal with it. Very mysterious. Like a Tibetan monk, spouting bizarre sayings and then fading into the shadows.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:24)

I'm actually closer to Morpheus. The Matrix Uncyclopedia is a system, Neo Cajek, and that system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But, until we do, these people are still a part of that system, and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And, many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it. Are you listening to me, Cajek, or are you staring at the woman in the red dress? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:37, Dec 6

I am so ready for secks with my adopter right now. What? What were you saying? ...Wut??? JESUS THAT HAD MEANING! PLUG ME IN, LED! I'M YOURS!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:39)

Perhaps Led was less harsh? On your first review I mean Cajek? MrN 21:28, Dec 6

Yeah... he's a good guy... I guess I should've told Garionepsilon specifically what was wrong...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:30)

The last thing we want to do is scare people off the pissing... Or I might have to do another one myself rather than typing a load of bollocks into a talk page... OK. I will piss off now... Have fun. Oh, did I mention? I got a feature on the front page... :) MrN 21:33, Dec 6

And I was right there to congratulate you! :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:34)

/me thinks he will do a review as well. Darwin is calling my name ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:40, Dec 6

No, seriously Cajek, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM?!?! (whips out notepad) You can tell us. We're here to help you. To help you help yourself. To the drugstore. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:38 Dec 06, 2007

It's true. "WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??!" Where did all these people come from? I mean like. WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??! Who am I? What's it all about? What are all these people doing here? I mean like... MrN 21:44, Dec 6

Hmm, fine. I understand that i probably should have put more stuff into that review. But because it was my first one, can you really blame me? And yes, you probably should have put a more decent reason for why you got rid of it. So, I'll forgive for deleting it.--Garionepsilon 09:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Enough of that Surely

Here's an idea. Maybe part of the problem above was caused because there is not really a very good (is there???) guide to how to do pee reviews and what is expected of them... Perhaps someone could write one? Now there is a challenge for you... MrN 21:57, Dec 6

I have been throwing that idea around for a while. Hold on a minute, I'm editing my archives, back to you in a jiff. While I'm gone, go ahead and spitball right here:   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 21:58)

Grr the missis is making me cook. I will give it some thought, and let you know later. MrN 22:01, Dec 6

THEY NEVE FUCKING READ DO THEY? ~ 22:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

FU EDIT CONFLICT!! *A-hem*. Wanders by again to agree with Mr. 9 and Cajek. There are guidelines that are there, but they really aren't well-advertised or thorough enough. Perhaps you can replace them. I'd be glad to help, if you want any. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:09, Dec 6

Mordillo, they don't read the guidelines because I don't think they're linked on the main page. Lemme go back in time about three minutes and fix that. —Hinoa talk.kun 22:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Plutonium? 1.21 gigawatts? 88 mph? Flying Delorians? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:15, Dec 6

Go back in time and fix recent reviews to show more reviews. Reviews.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 22:18)

Agrees that they are not well advertised. I clicked on "help" on the pee-review screen and it went to the main help page. To me if that "help" button told me something about pee-reviews it would be more helpful. MrN 22:39, Dec 6

Oh well, let's just edit Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Guidelines for now.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 22:42)

Those guidelines are very lacking.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 22:44)

Agreed that they are lacking. I was not aware that it was "acceptable" for "anyone" to edit those pages directly. Are you telling me that it's OK to do that? Anyone? If so, is it also "acceptable" to edit the main pee page also? Just the above the "Current Pees" marker I mean, it would obviously not be a good idea to mess with anything below 'Current Pees', but what about the top bit? MrN 23:21, Dec 6

If by "acceptable" you mean "will anybody ban me", the answer is no. If by "acceptable" you mean "is it acceptable", the answer is yes. If by "acceptable" you are offering "kinky sex" to "anybody" that "posted" on Cajek's "talk page", then I just "posted". Gimme. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahh! Mr Boomer, I was "surprised" that you had not made your mysterious "presence" felt previously. Your "clearly" quite the 'litter' "master"... WHY DON'T YOU WRITE AN ARTICLE! Seriously though, Cajek and I are going to have a little fiddle with the Pee help pages. As pissing on people is obviously your speciality why don't you give it a go also? I think something more about "If you want your stuff reviewed" then "do a review" is in order. Kinda like, you got to blow as well as suck, anything else is just SCAT. Or is that shit? Also a recommendation about looking at what has already been done to get an idea of what's good seems sensible, how about an example review which is "hard linked" to the help?. "Please Reply" MrN 00:41, Dec 7

Or, maybe we should just talk about Cajek on his talk page while he's not here? That seems a lot more fun... :) MrN 00:43, Dec 7

WHAT'D I MISS???? oh thank god the secks hasn't started yet... On to the guidelines! ...soon!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 7 / 00:49)

Notes the silence from Boomer when someone actually suggests he "writes" something... :P MrN 01:07, Dec 7

FU Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Bah, I'll start later tonight. For now, I have a textbook chapter I need to get reading. Excuse Man, away! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, I joined chat and wasted three hours. Time for bed. So sue me. I'll tell you that I'll do something over the weekend and forget/ignore/laugh-at it. I'm good at that sort of thing. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

*STAR WARS theme plays...*

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.... It is a period of Galactic unrest. Star Wars was nominated for VFH, but nearly failed, thanks to the efforts of the evil lord Darth Vader. However, during the nomination, Princess Prince TheLedBalloon managed to steal secret plans to the Empire's ultimate weapon, the DEATH STAR. Pursued by the Empire's sinister agents, he races home aboard his starship, custodian of the stolen plans that can save his people and restore freedom to the galaxy...

I can't believe it finally got featured, either. Thanks for voting!

Thanks again for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:53, Dec 7