User:Cajek/Archive11
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User:Cajek/Pee. |
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I fucked your mother by CheddarBBQ.Honestly, this feels like a retaliation review for Projectmayhem's take on the AFI article. Can't give it. --UU - natter
11:15, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Subsist off of an all-OREO® diet for the rest of your life by FookYooChineseFood.And nope. A word will be had. --UU - natter 11:26, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/J.P. Morgan by FookYooChineseFood.Nope. --UU - natter 11:26, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Nick Cave by FookYooChineseFood.Nope. --UU - natter 11:26, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cosmological Argument by CheddarBBQ.I'd say so, there is enough advice in here about improving it anyway. --UU - natter 11:15, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/AFI by Projectmayhem666.Can't argue it's in-depth. Might not agree with it, but it's all a matter of opinion! --UU - natter 10:39, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Captain D (quick) by Hype.Of course. --UU - natter 10:59, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Rorschach's journal by Guildy.Yes. --UU - natter 10:59, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mordillo/Why?Watching a marathon of House, M.D. while you're sick is not a good idea by Sycamore.Yay, a Syc review! I'd forgotten what they looked like! --UU - natter 10:59, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Is the bear a Catholic? by Projectmayhem666.Significant improvement. --UU - natter 10:39, Mar 1Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Unbooks:Diary of a Monkey Lover by Nachlader.Yes. --UU - natter 14:55, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Balloon Animals (2nd Review) by Kit paddle.Aye. --UU - natter 14:55, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Konqueror (rewrite) by IronLung.- Yup. --UU - natter 14:55, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write Good (reworked) by Guildy.No. Continues to be frustratingly inconsistent in his reviewing. --UU - natter 14:22, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Balloon Animals by Projectmayhem666.And no. I'm off to have a word. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Steak & Blow Job Day by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write Good by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/David Lynch by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Nachlader/Phrase by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBook:The Lost Introduction to Walden by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spawn by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pentium 4 (3rd review) by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Robitussin (rewrite) by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Tooltroll/The Fact is That Gerald Fits Edmund by Projectmayhem666.No, although I suspect Tooltroll will just be grateful it's finally been looked at. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English? (quick) by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Pointlessness (band) by Guildy.No. --UU - natter 14:22, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Brute by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hatstand (Limey request) by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/First!!!! (rewrite) by Projectmayhem666.No. --UU - natter 11:44, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Pig House/RunEscape by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hatstand by Tagstit.Yep. --UU - natter 14:03, Feb 27Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:ImNotASunbeam/Showers by Tagstit.Uh huh. --UU - natter 21:57, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Leonard Cohen by Sgtpanda.No. Time for a word, methinks. --UU - natter 21:36, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Grueslayer (2nd review) by Sgtpanda.No. Shame - BY asks for a good review and gets this. --UU - natter 21:36, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Deal with parents by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:57, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Negotiation by Kit paddle.Yepper. --UU - natter 21:57, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Private Eye by IronLung.That is sooo much more like it! --UU - natter 21:57, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Robitussin by Sgtpanda.No. --UU - natter 21:36, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sonic the Preggo by Sgtpanda.No. --UU - natter 21:36, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Turbocharger by Sgtpanda.No. --UU - natter 21:36, Feb 23Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/First!!!! by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 10:35, Feb 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hudson Plane Crash LF 3rd and final review by UU.Self check and all that jazz. Yup. --UU - natter 10:35, Feb 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Twilight (rewrite) by Kit.Yepper. --UU - natter 10:35, Feb 20Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ingrate by Snake7.For a first review, it'll do. --UU - natter 13:47, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/lou holtz by IronLung.Just about enough advice in the concept section. --UU - natter 13:43, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Solvent (2nd review and minor rewrite) by IronLung.No. --UU - natter 13:43, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fucktard by TPLN.Yup. --UU - natter 13:43, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Wacky Wavers brutally murdered (quick) by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 13:43, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fiona Apple by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 13:43, Feb 19Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Safari (Second Opinion) by Kit paddle.- Yep. --UU - natter 12:00, Feb 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Complex by Jlsmith.- Yes. --UU - natter 12:00, Feb 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Hyperbole/Adorable minorities by TPLN.- Enough advice to work with, so yes. --UU - natter 12:00, Feb 18Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/@@@@ by SPOUAA.- Not a review, just removing from queue. --UU - natter 21:53, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Octo-lizard battle (Help) by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:29, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Drive-thru by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:29, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Scientists discover link between Daylight Savings and Global Warming (quick) by Idiotic Idiot.Short yes, but this is what a quick review was originally meant to be, and I promised MrN I'd mark 'em accordingly. So yup. --UU - natter 21:53, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Kit_paddle/Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man by Kalir.Borderline. I'm gonna give it, but only just - it does at least try to be helpful and give a few ideas. Only just though. --UU - natter 21:42, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Birdy by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:29, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:YesTimeToEdit/Pull Over by Nachlader.Yep. --UU - natter 21:42, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bubblegum pop by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 21:29, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Amanda Steele, Action Cop by IronLung.Yup. --UU - natter 21:29, Feb 16Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Konqueror by Bitchass441.I think a more forceful word may be required, again no. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Safari by Bitchass441.Nope, had a word on his talkpage. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:The Redneck Elite (Abridged) by Bitchass441.Again, no. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spawn (second try) by Bitchass441.No. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Giratina by Bitchass441.No. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Scientists discover link between Daylight Savings and Global Warming (quick) by Idiotic Idiot.Very quick, but that's what was wanted, I guess. Yes. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:ZLaSh/Game of Life by MrN.First glance appears like a no, but considering the length of the article, MrN couldn't have said much more. And besides he referred to me at the end. So yes. - [14:15 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Foreigner's Guide to the United States by Pig House.No. - [13:50 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Problem of evil by Mnbvcxz.Mmm, just. - [13:50 15 February 2009]Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnGuides:Being an American Television Producer by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 12:14, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Alucard by Kit.Yup. --UU - natter 12:14, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/tarja turunen by SPOAUU.No. Mind you, there was no article to review, so it's not much more than removing it from the queue. --UU - natter 11:56, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Join Nonciclopedia II by Nachlader.Yuh. --UU - natter 11:56, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/New York Rangers by Gerry.Yup. --UU - natter 11:45, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Joe Biden Re-Revised Per Suggestions (quick) by Mnbvcxz.Aye. --UU - natter 11:45, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Friday the 13th (quick) by Hype.Da. --UU - natter 11:45, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Keith Lemon (rewrite) by MrN, glory of glories!Finally! The bugger gets the Platinum Pisser he's been dodging so long! --UU - natter 11:45, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Antonio Cipriani by Nachlader.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Coen Brothers by Guildy.Fine. --UU - natter 10:59, Feb 13Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Perfectionism (2nd Review) by Kit Paddle.Aye. --UU - natter 09:45, Feb 11Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ghetto White Boy Syndrome (again...) by Guildy.Yup. --UU - natter 15:04, Feb 10Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/SimShitty Article by Tagstit.Yap. --UU - natter 22:29, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gravity's Rainbow (rewrite) by IronLung.Yup. --UU - natter 23:11, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Girl Scout Cookies by Tagstit.Yip. --UU - natter 22:29, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Be Emo? (2nd Review) by Skate1168.Possibly a bit enthusiastic, but nonetheless, a significant improvement. Yep. --UU - natter 23:05, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Create a paradox that will probably end the universe as we know it by Tagstit.Yop. --UU - natter 22:29, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Metal Gear Solid by IronLung.Eeeh, just about. --UU - natter 23:11, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Raphaël Prentki by SPOAUU.Nope. Although I get the feeling it wasn't meant to be. --UU - natter 23:05, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pentium 4 (2nd review, quick) by Kit Paddle.Yes. that's 5, he's in if he wants in. --UU - natter 23:05, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Gravity's Rainbow (second opinion) by ThomasPynchonsLeftNut.Yup. good start. --UU - natter 22:51, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Tagstit/Unbooks:Dairy of a Monkey Lover by Sys.As expected. --UU - natter 22:51, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:TheLedBalloon/UnBooks (quick) by .. is that? It's a Yettie original!Good to see! --UU - natter 22:51, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Episcopal church by Guildensternenstein.Yup. a marked improvement, good to see. --UU - natter 22:39, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mrs J by Gerry.But of course, nice to see you about Mr C. --UU - natter 22:39, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Neurotic by Tagstit.Yup. --UU - natter 22:29, Feb 9Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Obama dog choice named by Simsilikesims.And no. A word, perhaps? –—Hv (talk) 2/02 16:26Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:SysRq/George W. Bush's Weekly Presidential Address: Week of January 25th, 2009 by Simsilikesims.No. –—Hv (talk) 2/02 16:26Tons by Skate1168 that I'm too lazy to fully list.Nine reviews, of which one section got a second line (just). You may want to talk to him about pees, UU. –—Hv (talk) 2/02 19:24Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Napoleon III by Mnbvcxz.This guy produces good reviews faster than I can roll my bottom row. –—Hv (talk) 2/02 16:26Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Hyperbole/Dexter is my favorite show ever!!! by BY.Good. –—Hv (talk) 2/02 16:26Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/cross country by Tagstit.Uh huh. –—Hv (talk) 2/02 16:26
