Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Grueslayer (2nd review)

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Grueslayer

So, it's not that I wasn't satisfied with the last review or anything...okay, yeah, it was kinda that. The review wasn't fleshed out enough. I really need an in-depth, lengthy review for this kind of thing.

So anyway, same rules as last time: just review the Easy Mode, rate everything about it, and please dole out suggestions for what's already there and for future content. Me and Trar would really appreciate it. BlueYonder - CONTACT

Whoops, sorry if you think that I did not give a good review. I guess next time I will just say it is a bad game. OK so you did hurt my feelings. ;( I thought your game was nice and this is what I get. ;(

--Skate1168 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

It's just that he wants some advice on how to improve it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, someone just told me that on my Talk Page, thanks! I am sorry that I suck at reviewing articles ;(

--Skate1168 23:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Look, I'm sorry and all, and I do appreciate your input, but I need a seriously deep review for something like this. You don't suck, you just need to be more comprehensive. BlueYonder - CONTACT

Don't worry, I feel a lot better now, and I understand. Two very nice users, named Tagstit and UU are giving me some tips about, reviewing and making templates.Oh! check out my NEW signature.

--Skate1168 (Talk) 17:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Cool. Just editing this one last time so people know it hasn't already been booked. BlueYonder - CONTACT

Humour:	10	VERY VERY funny. One of my favorites.
Concept:	9	Great idea love it!
Prose and formatting:	10	Perfect layout, just like DOS.
Images:	10	Great images there aren't many but its suppoesed to be like that
Miscellaneous:	9.8	I didn't actually win but I tried for a while.
Final Score:	48.8	Overall it's fantastic probably couldn't get any better!
Reviewer:	Sgtpanda 18:26, 21 February 2009 (UTC)