Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBook:The Lost Introduction to Walden
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
UnBook:The Lost Introduction to Walden[edit source]
Please, only someone familiar with Walden review this. Guildensternenstein 05:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9 | Although it's only at the peak of its humour if you are familiar with Walden, even without prior knowing, this article is quite funny. |
| Concept: | 7 | The article works very well, the concept has been used before but I've not read any other similar article as funny as this one. |
| Prose and formatting: | 7 | Some grammar errors in this, I'd correct them but I'm too busy clearing this backlog of reviews. |
| Images: | 8 | Images work very well, the mushroom caption made me laugh my arse off. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | A good article overall, it could do with improvements in the grammar department but that is all I'd change |
| Final Score: | 39 | Don't change the content, it works as well as I can see it working, not many people will be familiar with Walden which is why it has probably been here waiting for a review. My favourite part is in the first paragraphs when it refers back to the repetative narritive. |
| Reviewer: | --Projectmayhem666 Talk 23:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | |
For the record most of those grammatical errors (like the run-on sentences) are intentional, as that's how Thoreau writes. It's really quite painful, actually. Thanks for the review, though! --Guildensternenstein 04:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC).
- thats not the ones I was pointing out, I meant actualy grammatical errors.--Projectmayhem666 Talk 07:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)