User:JoeMonco/Pee Review/Paranoid Page
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Paranoid Page[edit | edit source]
I am writing a review for this article even though no one has asked for it. If you happen to hate unsolicited/flabbergastingly negative reviews, please feel free to make a big fuss about it.
JoeMonco 08:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
| Humo(u)r: | 1 | Let's face it - if there was something called the "humor enlargement pump", I would definitely jack this sucker of an article with it till the end comes. There is the short, and there is the short. I don't even know which part of the article to like, because as soon as it starts, it ends. What does it mean "Who sent you?" What does the "you" refer to? And why is this "you" supposed to be "sent"? What is the problem with the author? Does he/she think everyone works for IRS? What is with that animated gif thing? Are we supposed to believe now that animated gifs are the new fashion statement of all wiki articles? When I look at it, all I want is to gouge out those retarded rolling eyeballs with a crowbar. Humor? Heck no! |
| Concept: | 1 | Concept? I don't see any concept in this solid 3-second waste of time. It is contemptable to even think that such an atrocity of an "article" deserves to be associated in any way with the word "concept". If there was indeed any concept in this... thing, there is simply not enough of everything to convey it. It is an assault to all human sensibilities and each and every reader's intelligence. If anyone happens to like this steaming heap of a digital catastrophe at any rate, the terrorists win. |
| Prose and Formatting: | 1 | Excuse me on this but I don't think a discussion of prose on this one-sentence work of a slacker's is really all that necessary. If boiled lettuce was God's definition of lack of style, he had clearly been defeated by his own creation. Even if you don't count the loose words in the title, the article's literary pattern is still far too inadequate to warrant any merit. The same lack of noticable structural features applies also to the page's formatting in the exact fashion that the word "fraud" applies to Enron's account records. |
| Images: | 1 | This "article" deserves a 5 for having at least one picture, although the animated nature of said picture warrants a deduction of 4 points. |
| Miscellaneous: | N/A | |
| Final Score: | 5 | The presence of this article is begging for nuclear warheads to be rained upon Wikia's server farms and with the subsequent fallout large enough to eradicate all cockroaches on Earth twice. Any decent admin should now go and start hitting the "delete" button on it until it bounces off the keyboard and embeds itself to someone else's forehead. |
| Reviewer: | JoeMonco 08:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | |
| Disclaimer: This is not a genuine Pee Review entry. Any claim of such is at best an attack on the author's credibility and of malicious intents. The author of this review does not endorse or encourage the submission of any stub articles to the VFH page or any signed urinals to art gallaries. This page may induce nausea in some viewers and the lynching of negros. Any complaints in regards to this review should be directed to the author's lawyer and/or therapist. Note that the processing fees of such complaints are the applicant's responsibility. |
Dear Joe Monco:
Humor is subjective.
Love, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon 
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 13:02, Aug 6
- Who sent you? -- JoeMonco 15:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I could ask you the same question. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:48, Aug 6
- I could ask you the same question. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
