From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: What Would Jesus Do?
|
Score: 12 saviors too busy for your little shit problems
|
| Nominated by:
|
Le Cejak • <20:03, 21 Jun 2008>
|
For: 13
|
 For. Cheapinitreal created this comedy gold in just a few weeks' time. It's sparse on pictures, but it works pretty well without too many, anyway. It inspired me to maybe ask Jesus for a few favors sometime. Le Cejak • <20:03, 21 Jun 2008>- Strong For I made my mind up by the end of the second section. Very good work. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN20:14,21 Jun
- For he's a jolly good fellow who wrote this funny article in good taste and style. Numero Uno 12:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sell For I am glad people have enjoyed it.--- Cheapinitreal (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- A For If for no other reason, then because he mentioned under-boob.The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk)19:58, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- For Another Cheap original. -RAHB 01:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- For. Glad that's cleared up then. --UU - natter
 12:43, Jun 23
- For. --
 Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- For. Yep. --Ray Bob McCobb 17:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- For it had me at anal sex (which is not in my lexicon because its an outtie, not an innie) Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- For - "God's Grand Design of letting predestination and freewill fuck each other" -
 (Bonner)  (Talk) Jul 8, 18:19
- For I thought there were a few places which went over the top with the random. The bit about the midgets in particular perhaps need removing, but there were more than enough lolz to get my for. Another pic would really help. MrN
 00:22, Jul 9
- I wold like to indictate my intentions of voting FOR this article - I will, however, not be signing any contracts. Thank you. - [07:30 10 July] Sir FSt Don
 Yettie
|
Against: 1
|
- Against for the same reasons as below. And could someone fix that hanging timestamp please? --THINKER 19:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Abs. something about it doesn't appeal to me. I also don't like having this and WWJD; seems unnecessary. --THINKER 20:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. 
Abstain.--
13:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
13:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)