From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Scary Movie
|
Score: 13.5 Scary Movie Guys
|
| Nominated by:
|
   11:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 13.5
|
- Nom+4. It's better than "Cats", I'm going to read it again and again and again-- 11:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- W♥v. Very nice for a first feature. Good job, Tagstit. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- For per above, good review. --Mnbvcxz 16:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. "Scary move" has baggage. Luckily, this scary movie isn't that Scary Movie. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh Hamburgers! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:34, Jan 16
- For. Great article. --Docile hippopotamus 23:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Changing to for. The author let me spew some OCD onto this, and now I feel better about it. Hopefully I didn't ruin it, or anything... - T.L.B.
 WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:46, Jan 17
- For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 08:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. IronLung 08:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Changing to for per Led Le Cejak • <15:55 Jan 17, 2009>
- For. That little Ledding has allayed the few fears I had about this article... --UU - natter
 20:55, Jan 18
 For.. How can you not love an article telling you to "stay calm, you're just about to be killed". – Preceding unsigned comment added by Not A Good Username360 (talk • contribs) - For. Woot! 13th--Tagstit 00:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- For. 24.215.105.104 21:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
Weak against. To me it feels a little bit choppy, like it's moving along faster than it should be. Take a look at the prose, try to make it flow a little better, and I think it'll vastly improve the humor in this page. Also, you really should write out 'what the fuck'... just writing 'wtf' looks lazy. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:47, Jan 17
|
| Comments
|
- Rather high scoring pee review. 9's for concept and humor.
- It's weird that the article is talking directly to me, and telling me what I'm doing. You're not the boss of me, article! I remember writing suspicious (whore), and no one really gave me a direction to go in. I think this would be better if it was serious: you know, if it was like "In a haunted house, the first thing to take notice of is..." As it is right now, I'm not sure it's done. Keep on truckin, Doctor! Le Cejak • <14:41 Jan 16, 2009>
- I'll lookeesee.........the "steps 1-4" are puzzling and the shotgun of suspiciouseses in step 3 are suspiciously redundant. A few tweaks and I'd nom.-- 16:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, I was just saying how I thought they were kinda similar. Not suggesting nom. Le Cejak • <17:29 Jan 16, 2009>
- BEEEEEE warrrrry! I'm looking at all your user pages.....shuffling through your files.....shuffle shuffle shuffle....looking for articles to nom......scary.....-- 17:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Damn you, Doctor Nom! ...if you ARE a real doctor. But no, maybe I was too hasty on this article. Le Cejak • <18:02 Jan 16, 2009>
- You two are terrible at the sexy talk. Practice more offline. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Observation Doc Strange Hums pomp and circumstance -- 23:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Unrelated Observation Modusoperandi hums Bolero Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Unrelated Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrkRXTYNdDI -- 00:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For.. How can you not love an article telling you to "stay calm, you're just about to be killed". 
08:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)