From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Uncyclopedia:VFH/Forum:Article huffing (2nd)
|
Score: -3 in-in-in-jokes
|
| Nominated by:
|
Pup t 05:33, 21/09/2009
|
For: 3
|
 Nom and For If I find it funny I'm allowed to nominate it, aren't I? Pup t 05:33, 21/09/2009- For. Because I'll get credit if this gets featured. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:01, 12 November 2009
- This is so meta that it blows my fucking mind. Nominating our pointless argument over whether Skullthumper's take on what our silly forums look like is funny to outsiders? Leading to this discussion over whether nominating our pointless argument over whether Skullthumper's take on what our silly forums look like is funny to outsiders is, itself, funny to outsiders? Brilliant. Jean Baudrillard would be proud of you.
 pillow talk 18:36, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
#Against. For the same reason as last time. ChiefjusticeDS 07:55, September 21, 2009 (UTC) Invalid. Imaginary voting (see comment, below, by me, Modusoperandi. Soak up my wisdom, Uncyclopedia!). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:27, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. That silly Pup. Always pushing the boundaries. /shakes head • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 06:15, Nov 12 2009
- Against. You kids and your stuff. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:55, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:05, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. For real this time. ChiefjusticeDS 23:30, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Do you really want people's first impression of this site to be our inside jokes? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 05:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. MrN
 18:00, Nov 13
|
| Comments
|
 Hypothetical Comment Supposing this is featured (which it won't be), how would we divide authorship? "Yeah, I've got 10.002 features. Check out UN:HS." And in my slot, there will be: "Uncyclopedia:VFH/Forum:Article huffing (2nd) (with CheddarBBQ, Sockpuppet of an unregistered user, TheLedBalloon, Teh_pwnerator, Staircase....) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 06:15, Nov 12 2009
- Hypothetical Answer - we don't divide authorship into small fractions. We just give everyone involved half a feature. For example, for Category:My sojourn, about seven people got a half-feature. pillow talk 19:28, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Is the VFH page or the Forum page that was VFHed(and failed) being nominated? If it's the Forum page, the link should be changed to reflect it. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 16:21, Thursday 12 November 2009
- It's the nomination page. Feel free to nominate the forum though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:37, 12 November 2009
- We already nominated the forum. What you should feel free to nominate is this page, right here. The one I'm typing on right now. pillow talk 18:37, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- What I want to know is how I managed to vote 2 months before everyone else. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:19, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Especially considering that your comment was your first edit on this page. Personally, I blame Necropaxx. This is because it was his fault. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:27, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Nom and For If I find it funny I'm allowed to nominate it, aren't I? 
Hypothetical Comment Supposing this is featured (which it won't be), how would we divide authorship? "Yeah, I've got 10.002 features. Check out 