Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnDebate:Is it the size of the ship or the motion in the ocean?

Article: UnDebate:Is it the size of the ship or the motion in the ocean?	Score: 0 Sizes of the ships defendants or motion in the ocean defendants
Nominated by:	Sir Pease whizz Biblio HOS Awards 22:02 3.29.13
For: 2	SN+F - Got some opinions from Aly and Leverage and this is the result! Sir Pease whizz Biblio HOS Awards 22:02 3.29.13 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:08, 29 March 2013
Against: 2	Limp boner. Well, what can I say here...it's clever in parts. The concept is great, it looks like it's coming out of the gate pretty well, and then the consistency just sort of drops. I mean, I realize it's not like we all don't know what is being talked about, but if the characters are trying to hide it behind the sailing analogy (which is definitely funnier than just coming out and saying it), then they should continue on with that analogy throughout. There are times where this is just completely abandoned to talk straight up about sex as though we're just sitting in a bar with some guys. The other thing, is that there's not a whole lot in the way of jokes here that I haven't heard on this topic before. Talking about plundering the treasure and what-not. With some really well-thought out new puns, and some better fine details, it could be a fantastic article but as is, if you'll excuse the pun, I feel like it's pretty flat. Also it makes me flaccid. -RA HB 05:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Against. The language needs to maintain the poetry of the concept. Also, there's so much more you could do with this excellent idea. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Plane was delayed so I wrote this at the aiport. User:Leverage/boats . That is how I would take the page, try to make the use of innuendos as subtle as possible, given that they are fairly coarse in themselves. Leverage (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC) rahb and lobster has it right imho. The jokes are eitger too subtle or a little too explicit. If there was a secondary concept in tthe article I think thithis would he aa knock out...its a really original idea. --ShabiDOO 02:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)