From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Slender
|
Score: 10 people lost in the woods
|
| Nominated by:
|
ChiefjusticePSX 07:57, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
For: 13
|
- Self-nom and for. I wrote this on a whim yesterday, having read the last attempt at writing an article on this topic. I am actually genuinely pleased with how it turned out and thought I'd give it a whirl on here. If there are problems with it then I'd love to hear about them, please bear this in mind if voting against. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:57, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Short, but I like it. --Snippy 08:36, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 11:53, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
 For. User:Matthlock/sig2 00:15, September 20, 2012 (UTC)- For. A rare video-game article designed for humor rather than to rant to other gamers. Spıke ¬ 09:14 20-Sep-12
- For. 216.80.68.163 19:26, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
- For. However, I find the phrase "eponymous eight pages" slightly questionable, seeing that eponymous and titular are in the same semantic field. zheoliel 16:11 September 22
- For. Tubacool (talk) 14:51, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:32, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
- For. 180.234.235.192 08:29, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 17:52, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:42, 1 October 2012
- For. A slender for but still a vote in favour.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:51, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
- For. This will attract new 4chan users to our dwindling userbase! Also, I hate faces, so I'm also voting on those grounds. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:40, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
 Against. Is this a parody of something I don't get? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Rei (talk • contribs) 19:46, September 20, 2012
- No, it's about the PC game Slender, which you can read about here. If there are any issues with the article I can change then please drop me a message here. --ChiefjusticePSX 15:48, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
 Against. Certainly more intelligent than typical internet/video game articles, and for that it's very nice. It still doesn't rise beyond the "this game is bad and that makes it funny" concept for me. Sorry. -RAHB 23:39, September 25, 2012 (UTC)- Against. What RAHB said. --General of All Branches of the Military and the Head of the State Police Eric (talk) 00:57, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. 
Against. Is this a parody of something I don't get? 
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:03, October 10, 2012 (UTC)