Uncyclopedia:VFH/Sex On Uncyclopedia (2nd nomination)

Article: Sex On Uncyclopedia	Score: -0.5 Offended Users
Nominated by:	Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 6	Nom+For. Looks good to me. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC) For. I too am deeply offended by you sex mongers....for shame!-- 01:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 4 - I can't decide whether to laugh or be pissed off. I think I'll laugh. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 15:20, Jan 27 for per above. --Mnbvcxz 18:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC) Fuck these kinds of rants. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC) For. Per how real it seems. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 6.5	Against. I fail to find anything funny in here, besides a couple of image captions. That may be due to my unwillingness to mouse over every wikilink, however. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC) Against Too injokey. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 15:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Against. mousing ovr evry link sukks 87.198.229.90 11:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Against. The only jokes are the links, and the pictures (especially the gay man) are just stupid. Ryuinfinity 14:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Against. Like has been said all the jokes are in the links and in teh images which doesn't make a featured article. More importantly this feels like an attack on Nerd42 (whom bassically all this text was stolen from) and (although I compleatly dissagree him) that's wrong, erring on cyberbullying. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 02:53 2 February 2009 Against. Nope. Mr N 03:51, Feb 6
Comments	Sporked from former User rant-- 23:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Abstain. If the images make me want to cut myself, I won't read the article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:21, Jan 27