From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: In the beginning
|
Score: 4 days of Creation, with a partridge in a pair tree.
|
| Nominated by:
|
Scofield 14:06, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 8
|
 For. It deserves a place on the Main Page. --Scofield 14:06, December 10, 2010 (UTC)- SelfFor. I'll see if I can add some more images. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:26, 10 December 2010
- For. - God made the universe in 6 days. Impressive. My span between showers is longer than that. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
         17:48, Dec. 10, 2010
- For. The text isn't big enough. -- The Zombiebaron 07:53, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Damn. I wanted to nominate that. M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 13:30, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I went back again after a couple of days and it seems funnier and has new pics which are funny. So I have come around to the light side to vote for this God forsaken page. Aleister 13:57 13 12
- I was very wary to begin with, but after reading for a while it flowered into one of the most absurd and hilarious things I've read for a while. --Black Flamingo 21:53, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Per Zombiebaron. --EMC [TALK] 22:22 Dec 26 2010
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. Don't think the large type approach is in itself funny, also needs more pix and perhaps normal size would be an improvement too. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:13, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Not funny, no real ideas. I don't really like the format - makes us seem like we're for blind people Sycamore (Talk) 15:03, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Too big why not just use normal sized text, it makes me feel dyslexic N9099 17:55, December 12, 2010 (UTC)
 Against. While the article is coherent and not random drivel and the jokes and image captions were funny (imo), they did not really enhance the article beyond a first laugh at the idea of a not-so-serious God, and that, imo, is not enough for a featured article. Schamschi 01:00, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. I hate babies. Also, you cold have told me this was what the image was for... wasn't it? 1234 ~
 16:37, 10 December, 2010 16:37, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
- And the print is too big - 3-8 words per line is just silly. 1234 ~ 23:15, 10 December, 2010
- I was going to vote... then I decided it's still too big. 1234 ~ 22:25, 14 December 2010
- Also - I love big text. I'm fed up of straining my eyes to see these fashionable micro-fonts. --Black Flamingo 21:53, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. It deserves a place on the Main Page. --
Against. While the article is coherent and not random drivel and the jokes and image captions were funny (imo), they did not really enhance the article beyond a first laugh at the idea of a not-so-serious God, and that, imo, is not enough for a featured article. 
