From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
imported>DrStrange |
| Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| |
*'''Comment'''. And don't shoot marihuana into your veins! {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 07:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC) |
|
*'''Comment'''. And don't shoot marihuana into your veins! {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 07:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC) |
| |
*'''Comment'''. Also - if this never gets featured, I suggest sporking and editing the talk page for a new article. Context? Dunno. Some argument I guess. Now the talk page is too long in my view. At least for the MTV generations. {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 08:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC) |
|
*'''Comment'''. Also - if this never gets featured, I suggest sporking and editing the talk page for a new article. Context? Dunno. Some argument I guess. Now the talk page is too long in my view. At least for the MTV generations. {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 08:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
*'''Comment'''. I really appreciate the support from those of you who won't let this one die. I believe it was originally a poo-lit article and it got two good scores and one ZERO by someone who went off on a rant about it - and it cost the article from placing. That same dynamic will not go away and that's why it'll never get featured. I accepted that a long time ago. IMO: Yes, the various Jesii are nothing new, yes the actual writing is sparse and focuses mostly on reactions to the subject instead of an actual article about the subject. It's image based too. That never stopped anything from getting featured. I can't think of anything resembling a legion of Jesii arguing about a new, gay addition to the clan and being humanly pissed off about people mocking Jesus. I used it as a metaphor for people's never ending versions of who the "real" Jesus is and what he would say. Hey, if it aint' funny then it should get your {{against}} vote. That's all that matters IMO.--{{User:DrStrange/sig}} 00:20, November 25, 2010 (UTC) |
| |
}} |
|
}} |
Revision as of 00:20, 25 November 2010
| Article: Gay Jesus
|
Score: 6.5 people who think the time has come
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister
|
For: 9
|
 Nom&for&twistythumbs up Just thinking that maybe the time has come for DrStrange's masterwork to see the light of daze. Imnho should have been featured long long ago in all lands and timezones. Aleister 16:40 22 11- For. This should've been featured last time this was nommed. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:43, 22 November 2010
- For. Ah, hells... snrk. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 19:00 (UTC)
- ... Aw, why the hell not? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:49, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
 Minty. I found it to be humorous.  + = 20:19,22November,2010- For. THough I assumed i'd hate it from the title. --Sog1970 23:19, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Eternal punishment is accruing in my personal account with the Bank of God, on a daily basis, as long as this article exists. Just read the talk page. --
   00:02, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 17:31, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. OK. I first thought something more biting could have been written - but when I read the talk page - loosely - and got to the point where Modus takes a righteous stand, I completely caved in. The idea of the article may not be the best ever, but bits and parts save the whole thing. Style
 Guide 07:51, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 2.5
|
- gay --121.214.144.116 06:05, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Doesn't really do anything new. It's not really an article. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Where's the feces? I'm getting pretty sick of this Jesus stuff. --Roman Dog Bird 22:11, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Doc is right to point out the talk page, it is itself a masterpiece. So this nom is like a two-fer. It's the only talk page ever voted "Good" on Votes For Good (VFG). Amen. Aleister 00:18 23 11
 Abstain. - I don't really see the article here - just a series of images.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:15, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
- The actual article would fit on a postage stamp. Kind of a stub really. The bulk of it constantly refers to itself ;-) -- 17:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. And don't shoot marihuana into your veins! Style Guide 07:52, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Also - if this never gets featured, I suggest sporking and editing the talk page for a new article. Context? Dunno. Some argument I guess. Now the talk page is too long in my view. At least for the MTV generations. Style Guide 08:07, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. I really appreciate the support from those of you who won't let this one die. I believe it was originally a poo-lit article and it got two good scores and one ZERO by someone who went off on a rant about it - and it cost the article from placing. That same dynamic will not go away and that's why it'll never get featured. I accepted that a long time ago. IMO: Yes, the various Jesii are nothing new, yes the actual writing is sparse and focuses mostly on reactions to the subject instead of an actual article about the subject. It's image based too. That never stopped anything from getting featured. I can't think of anything resembling a legion of Jesii arguing about a new, gay addition to the clan and being humanly pissed off about people mocking Jesus. I used it as a metaphor for people's never ending versions of who the "real" Jesus is and what he would say. Hey, if it aint' funny then it should get your
 Against. vote. That's all that matters IMO.-- 00:20, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Nom&for&twistythumbs up Just thinking that maybe the time has come for 
Minty. I found it to be humorous. 
Abstain. - I don't really see the article here - just a series of images.--
Against. vote. That's all that matters IMO.--