Uncyclopedia:VFH/2012 (Second nom)

Article: December 21, 2012	Score: 2.5 Earth shattering events
Nominated by:	Funnybony 15:17, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
For: 7.5	For. (MrN9000 rewrite) Funnybony 15:18, February 5, 2010 (UTC) For. Yea, it's a bit listy, but I think that makes sense in an article like this where there are so many different opinions... Mr N 16:52, Feb 5 For. I'll be reading Terry Deary's Angry Aztecs on 20/12/12. --•••••• WAR KICKS ASS!!!!! PEACE RULES!!!!!! VEGGIES FAIL BIG TIME meat is MURDER EUTHANASIA IS WRONG MERCY DEATH IS FINE - Are you IN or are you OUT of the LOO P? 18:38, February 5, 2010 (UTC) Four. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:58, 6 February 2010 Scared For Shook me to my core. Aleister in Chains 23:18 21 Dec. 2012 For. —Sir ¬_¬ \| Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:23, February 7, 2010 (UTC) For. 95.149.241.250 23:14, February 7, 2010 (UTC) For. 124.187.175.240 12:19, February 8, 2010 (UTC) For the end is near! 81.165.226.51 14:41, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against This has some good ideas in it but it's also a random mess. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:20, February 6, 2010 (UTC) Against for the same reason as Matt. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 09:52, Feb 8 2010 Against As above really, I couldn't get along with this one. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:22, February 8, 2010 (UTC) Against. By trying to include too much this article has lost its direction in my view. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 12:47, February 8, 2010 (UTC) Against*. There's a good article in here, but it's buried a little. Needs a bit of tough love - this could probably be improved by cutting out about a third of the content, leaving it leaner, meaner, and punchier. Plus, some of the extraneous bits are, as observed elsewhere, a bit random, and drag the article down. --UU - natter 12:11, Feb 12*
Comments	This article has been redone by MrN9000, those who love his style will enjoy it this go around. Funnybony 15:18, February 5, 2010 (UTC) Everything the man just said above is wrong on so many levels... This is Funnybony's article, and he will be getting the FA credit in the unlikely event that this is featured. Mr N 16:52, Feb 5 It's close, but I'm not quite there yet. I think it needs a bit of cleanup yet. It is still a bit random (Samuel Jackson?) and uses "I" maybe once too often. I like the direction though and I know with a bit more love MrN will turn this into something much better. so, for now, abstain. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:20, 6 Feb