Talk:A story built two words at a time

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to A story built two words at a time. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

See also: Forum:A forum thread built one comment at a time

And when we though the saga was over, a new one emerged... DaniPine3 (talk) 01:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in...--ݬલטαฬ םɐۼ - ᚦ¡ទᑕʋᛢᛇ - ɪ øటñ ᑌᑎᑦᛉ๔1០ᖀξᗟᛧą - but ɳ̩ɵɞ_°₫￥ ເἀᚱΞᛇ 16:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

What happened?

WTF happened to this page? It has turned from a normal story into women kissing. wtf man – Preceding unsigned comment added by My Face Is Beautiful (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure. Suddenly we're writing about women kissing, i guess. 15:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

I think it was the best outcome, honestly... DaniPine3 (talk) 15:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Well, I think not. User:My Face Is Beautiful 20:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Why? DaniPine3 (talk) 00:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm not trying to be rude or anything, but it's not really much of a story anymore. Fenris2010 (talk) 02:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't think any of these pages are much of a story anymore, to be honest. 13:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

A story built one image at a time and A story built one sentence at a time have somewhat of a story. --Fenris2010 (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, but that's because people there have a tad more of freedom to expand their ideas, allowing for a more coherent story. Look how the most coherent of the stories is A story built one paragraph at a time, where people have a whole paragraph for them to build upon. In contrast, look in A story built one word at a time and A story built one time at a word, where coherence is rather lacking. And don't get me started in A story built one word at a time and A story built one byte at a time, where most strings of characters don't even look like words -let alone like existing words. As you can see, the coherence of A story built one x at a time-type of stories depends on the freedom people have to build their ideas. Here, where you can place two words rather than only one, the story does have a bit more of coherence, but lacks any possibility to have an actual plotline.
Besides, girls kissing are cool. And so is gayness in general. I see no problem in the "story" being about this. DaniPine3 (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

It could be possible to make a plotline. I don't think it lacks possibility. You could easily make a coherent story using just two words at a time. Same with the other "A story built one x at a time"s. Fenris2010 (talk) 20:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but that requires that the people writing the story are co-operating to actually write something coherent, and that will probably never happen. 13:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

True. Fenris2010 (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)