Forum:Flamewar, a good space for Uncyclopedia

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Flamewar, a good space for Uncyclopedia

Note: This topic has been unedited for 5978 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I was on Conservapedia earlier, and I had noticied that they had somthing called "Debate Topics", I suggest that we form a new namespace called Flamewar:, and link it as Flamewar Topics. There we can argue about anything, like pancakes and doughnuts. We can "flame" about anything, and it will be gud. Just my two cents worth. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Shut up, you conservative faggot!

Hear that kids, once you go to Conservapedia, your mind gets full of Conservative Propaganda. What I recommend is a 2 hour of Uncyclopedia exposure over a 7 day period until your Conservapedia trends vanish. If symptoms persist, please see your Local Doctor. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 00:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Serious response: No thanks, no more flamewars are necessary right now, we have too many as it is.

Silly response: Yeah, sorry, I can't think of anything silly right now. Oh well, maybe next time. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, Nov 23

Exhuberant response You were on Conservapedia? You're lucky that nobody here cares about Conservapedia! (Except for you!) (Also, me!) (But, then, I'm enamored with this "internets" thing!) (I'm also easily excitable!) Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Flame response: Yeah, but your Mum's so fat she needs her own namespace. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I have 2 dads. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:56, Nov 23

Damn you leddy! It's like Macbeth all over again. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Is this a dagger which I see before me, the handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:39, Nov 23

I was thinking more of "No man of woman raised shall fail to be slightly insulted by Macbeth's Your Mum jokes." But perhaps I'm paraphrasing it slightly. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but the dagger part is, like, way better. He's all like, no way, a dagger, what up, dagger? And the dagger is like dude, I'm not real, but go kill Duncan. No, seriously, go kill him. And then I woke up and the teacher was reading Hamlet. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:51, Nov 23

Ah, you shouldn't sleep through Hamlet. You might wake up with a strange desire to kill your uncle. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Fucker's been asking for it! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:58, Nov 25

Clichéd response: Nobody cares. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:58 Nov 23, 2007

BENSON's response: BENSON WILL KILL YOU ALL! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:01, Nov 23

Olipro's response: Conservapedia has no tits. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 02:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Winkler's response: GAY. --Andorin Kato 09:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop. Hammer time! *proceeds to smite entire forum with hammer* • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:53, 23 Nov 2007

Go. —rc (t) 18:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Torte ist gut. --EMC ^[TALK] 02:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

If I Had A Dollar for every good debate on Conservapedia, I would have two dollars. I hate being poor. Fuck this idea. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  22:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)