User:NeoZidane/Sig/vote

Tiny tiny Prototype

Score: 0

• I doubt this is 12px tall. --Sir Zombiebaron 01:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

The Horribly Big Version

     Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk 

Score: -10000

• Nom & For It's nice big. Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk
• Against. as if this vote is going to make the blindest bit of difference. 7 days hon! -- sannse (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's ludicrously big. I'm with sannse here. --PantsMacKenzie 18:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!! - Well I don't know really, it's just the fact that someone might find it, and the evil sannse has ICUed it. But it is cool. --—Braydie 19:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Send me the paycheck later. -- Sir Mafagafo  (talk to me) 19:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• I Approve This Message, 20:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• cant you keep it in the same style and just shrink it down a bit--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 21:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I especially like the C at the end. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
• Forgainst It is funny. I chuckle whenever I see it; it's like, "Launch the Federation starship Signature." Maybe reduce it by 1/3? --Alksub 07:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Its big and flashy.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Letting you do this and no one else is unfair to everyone else. Letting everyone do this would look horribly ugly and ruin pages. So, yeah.--<<>> 00:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Kill it. A sig is for letting people know who wrote a comment. I have no idea what the hell yours is for. Also, what Brad said. I also vote against everyone who voted for it. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:14, 1 Jan 2007

I should also say, your tiny tiny prototype is way too tall. The limit is either 12 pixels (or maybe 20), and that one still fails both. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:17, 1 Jan 2007

• Die, Bastard this sig is terrible. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

<template removed by sannse - ewww...>

• Cool, artistic, but I award you the above. --HP FP talk 05:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• May BENSON crush it! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 06:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

A More Realistic Version

     Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk 

Score: +4

• Nom and For My version is better, or at least it is smaller. --Sir Zombiebaron 19:46, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment Is that for mine being big or small? – Preceding unsigned comment added by NeoZidane (talk • contribs)

No, its more of a "new" version of a bunch of other folk's sigs, since I can't code :) --Sir Zombiebaron 19:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and its for your sig being small and looking like what I made. --Sir Zombiebaron 19:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Well that thing you made isn't hmm, how do you say, BIG enough, so never!

Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk

Acctaully sannse said on IRC that sigs can be no bigger then "3px", so it may acctaully be too big. --Sir Zombiebaron 20:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

• For. A lot more reasonable.--<<>> 00:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 04:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Conditional For, must change "CUN" to "CUNT". » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Another Version

NeoZidane ☭

Score: 2+

• Well, I tried, you can add more stuff in by increasing the width of the background. And it's better than the one above. —Braydie at 16:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Naw, I say keeping his sig on the invisible side is more appropriate. :) --Sir Zombiebaron 18:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Haha —Braydie at 18:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Think this is acceptable both by your ego and our eyes. -- 200.231.198.227 18:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)