From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnDebate:Is one a number?
|
Score: 1.5 fake numbers
|
| Nominated by:
|
Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
|
For: 5.5
|
 For. Why not? An UnDebate for FA is rare, and this is one of our best ones. It's funny, has excellent formatting, and has a really good concept. For an UnDebate, being funny is just 33.3% of the picture, but it excels in all 3 categries. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)- For. One is definitely a number. In fact, it's the loneliest number that you'll ever do. That being said, two can be as sad as one; it's the loneliest number since the number one.
 PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 01:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- For. Pretty good for an UnDebate. Cassandra (talk) 09:39am March 28, 2021
For.  Against. Maybe a tough choice now. HuhIdidnthearyou (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Both of their votes are being struck out until he chooses which one to go through with. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak for. Eh, it's tolerable.
 JJPMaster 18:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- For.Yeah SureMakerJulian (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- For. This is very humorous and has a lot of elements which make it a great number. So anyways, 0, 2, 3, 4, ... LeSheeple, the sheepiest Sheeple (talk) 23:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
# Against. HuhIdidnthearyou (talk) 12:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Both of their votes are being struck out until he chooses which one to go through with. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Against What's the joke? -- The Zombiebaron 19:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Against Re:Zombiebaron WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 14:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Against. Just not funny. MrX blow me
 23:18, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Against. I think the joke is metareferential: there is no joke and that's the joke. Or it's just a boring, very boring article. Nadienator4000010 (talk) 06:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. Short and a little low on humour. Won't vote against but puzzled as to why it ought to be featured in its current state ShabiDOO 21:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)- Comment. I agree with @ShabiDOO. HuhIdidnthearyou (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. Why not? An UnDebate for FA is rare, and this is one of our best ones. It's funny, has excellent formatting, and has a really good concept. For an UnDebate, being funny is just 33.3% of the picture, but it excels in all 3 categries. 
Against. Maybe a tough choice now. 
Comment. Short and a little low on humour. Won't vote against but puzzled as to why it ought to be featured in its current state 