From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnBooks:Hot Japanese Girls - Colourblind or Unable to Speak English?
|
Score: 16 repressed gaijin
|
| Nominated by:
|
Projectmayhem666 Talk 22:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- Nom & For This article is very amusing and the concept is original. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs)
 For. I love this article! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)- Rigging the boat. With thanks to DrStrange for the helping hand on the prose. Why not vote for him? --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Allmightyred 11:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 14:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. I remember reviewing and enjoying this. --UU - natter
 15:27, Feb 25
- Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:16, Feb 25
- For. Great concept--
   16:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN16:52, 25 Feb
- Hai!. - Nachlader hentai desu! Sugoi! --Kit talk 21:32 25 February
- Using my limited Japanese skills, "Nachlader is hentai. Great!", right?. And using my limited Svenska skills, "Tack så mycket!" --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- That was a correct interpretation, although inomplete =) Hentai means in this context pervert so the full (contextual) translation reads - Nachlader is such a pervert! Awesome! Oh and, jag är imponerad över dina skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Cheers ;) --Kit talk 17:40 27 February
- Hai Totemo ii desu yo! --TPLN 17:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Dammit, you both need to give me help on my Japanese... --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 18:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- If I remember corectly; TPLN wrote something like Indeed, so are you. (talking about me I guess) =D --Kit talk 17:43 27 February
- For. --Docile hippopotamus 05:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above Mnb'z 06:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- If you had asked me, I would have sworn that this had already been featured. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- For It is da best - Shteve
- For. Hee hee hee! No speak ingreeesh! ~Formerly Annoying Crap 20:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
Its a nomination for the article, all authors on the article, well the main ones, will be given credit where it is due. --Projectmayhem666 Talk 00:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
How long until this article is just nominated and no longer voted on?--68.63.145.190 21:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- As long as it takes son, as long as it takes.
On a completely ununrelated topic; I know there's been some vote rigging shenanigans going on with this nom, but the article is still damn funny and well written. If this fails because of said shenanigans I'd be happy to re-nom it as a fresh start, a clean slate. A tabula rosa if you will. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:31, 26 Feb
- What shenanigans are you talking about? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- D'oh! Nevermind, I believe I was thinking of a different article or possibly just high. Nothing to see here, move along. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:40, 26 Feb
- If people DID rig the vote for one of my own articles then I'd be switching my vote over in a second. --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- There hasnt been any rigging that I've seen, I know everyone here, none are multiple accounts so where's the rigging, Friggin' in the riggin--—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. I love this article! -
23:02, Mar 1 23:02, 1 March 2009 (UTC)