Uncyclopedia:VFH/Interstate 95 (third nomination)

Article: Interstate 95	Score: -2 interstate(s)
Nominated by:	Well, let's go a 3rd time. As I know, Uncyclopedia:VFH/Interstate 95 (2nd nomination) was quite contentious. Ultimately, it failed pretty big, getting -1 support when an article needs +5. But this time, I think we can do better. This time, as it had been significantly improved, I think this could reasonably be up here. I know it will take a lot - due to sanctions, I can't really comment here, so please leave extended comments (more then just abstain votes), on Talk:Interstate 95, I will create a section for that in just a moment. We have never seen an interstate article on the Main Page, and I think it deserves it, though I do acknowledge work needs to be done. Many previous problems had to do with the shear amount of redlinks, which are long gone. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
For: 1	For. Though I don't know if it will pass or if this will go to a 4th nom. There may also be a moratorium on nominating this, if this fails. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against Short sections should be fleshed out, and the article lacks an overall premise. -- The Zombiebaron 18:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Against. This article feels like watching paint on the wall dry. RealLifeCartman (talk) 02:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Against. Why would you nominate an article for VFH when you acknowledge “work needs to be done”?? MrX blow me 06:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This article isn't ready for featurehood. It lacks humour or any clear concept. ShabiDOO 18:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Comment. The states need to be fleshed out more. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)