Uncyclopedia:VFH/Cricket

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Cricket (history, logs)

Article: Cricket

Score: 0 fat and bored umpires

Nominated by: Ptok-Bentoniczny 07:03, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
For: 6
  1. For! Really really good article! Ptok-Bentoniczny 07:06, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  2. Four An awful lot of this article is very very funny. I agree with Necropaxx that the quotes are...crappy. Might remove them mAttlobster. (hello) 12:16, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. Needs the red links removed. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 16:02, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. 173.21.112.255 17:06, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
  5. For. 117.200.80.106 20:01, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
  6. For. [b]- zhelili ??? 06:41 October 21
  7. For. Callen1992 22:43, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 6
  1. Completely qualified against. Saw the mass of quotes and died a little inside. Scrolled down. And down. And down. And while I'm sure this is a "hilarious" article, TMS recently in my mind prompts me to give a no. Wot. Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 07:16, Oct 19
  2. Against. What Necropaxx said. ChiefjusticeDS 15:07, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. As long as a Geoffrey Boycott innings, and with about as much excitement. Actually, that's uncharitable - there are some good bits in here (particularly if you love the sport, as I do) but they're buried. It takes the approach of trying to be all things to all people and fitting in loads of stuff that may be better off in several smaller articles. It's confused, confusing, too long, and with really diligent editing, could probably be cut down to a decent highlights package around a third of the length. Hang on - that is like a Boycott innings. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 17:56, Oct 19
  4. Not yet. It's a nice article, but needs a bit of a cleanup before it might be featured. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 20:41, 19 October 2009
  5. Against. --Docile hippopotamus 09:36, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
  6. Well, looks like somebody removed most of the fail quotes. I took the liberty of removing the truely aweful Oscar Wilde quote that was left there for some unfathomable reason (seriously, that was about the worst Oscar Wilde quote I've ever seen, and that's saying something). Then I read it. It was tough to read through this all. Needs to be trimmed and made more accessible before it can be featured. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN22:53, 20 Oct
    Wait, "aweful", as in full of awe? Why would you remove it then? --SIR Pretentious Loser (Have a mocha cappuccino and a sit down)
    No, aweful as in "Good lord OptyC's spelling is aweful!". -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:38, 21 Oct
Comments
  • This is one of best Uncyclopedia articles I've read here. IT makes me laugh even I'm from non-cricketing nation :P – Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptok-Bentoniczny (talk • contribs) . Oh, in my opinion quotes are VERY COOL. Really. made me to read this article in fact, unsigned Ptok-Bentoniczny. Think about it. I've read and couldnt find anything boring. 1. this made me to know what cricket really is. nobody in Poland know what cricket is. really (most poles thinks that its game croquet played in French :P), and now i loke watching this on Eurosport 2. After and befoer knowing rules it made me laugh, so its funny to noobs and those that know cricket. Definetely it shall be featured :)
  • Symbol comment vote.svg Comment. Age of Umpires was pretty good too. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:51, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
The IPs are scoring very slowly here, taking the odd single where it's available, but they're working their way back into the game. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:05, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
Yes, but remember it's several days test match. They don't want to risk, losing wickets at this point of game would be crucial for result. Ptok-Bentoniczny 09:47, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
Who's this guy who's just hit a 'For' on his first ball on Uncyclopedia?? Incredible stuff. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:45, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
Well, Matt. Maybe he is just one of lower-order batsmen, but he is on his good way to maiden century in this test just to save match for FORS side. That's incredible! Ptok-Bentoniczny 10:04, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, just if somebody wonders from which hell I came, I came from hell named Poland... :P I wrote there about 250 articles (I have a list on my user page there :P) and got 16 featured articles, so just don't think I'm some kind of noob/newbie :P Ptok-Bentoniczny 10:00, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH