From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Car
|
Score: 1 drivers and/or pedestrians
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mimo&maxus
|
For: 5
|
 Nom + For Just for the pictures, it deserves to be featured. --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 12:59, November 30, 2010 (UTC)- For the pictures Didn't read the page (I've never read a car article here) just looked at the pictures, and you're right. The first one is the most boring though, and should be changed out if this gets close to the magic number. Aleister 13:07 30 11
- For. I actually like this one despite some of its general traditional problems. Like the long list. Dr. Fenwick 22:04, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's about time! DJ Mixerr
- For. In spite of so many quotes at the start, I think it's a funny approach. If everyone chips in all little edits can be made in time for it to feature, Funnybony
   20:01, Dec 1 20:01, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. I did read it. It needs work. Some random needs removing, that fucking great list needs to die, there are far too many images, and generally it needs a tender, lovin' touch. Or a really quite brutal one, that might work too. --UU - natter
 16:16, Nov 30
- Against. UU's right. I started reading it as well and noticed much the same... then I got sidetracked by a comma, got sidetracked, and wandered off for a day or two. But UU is right. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 23:47 (UTC)
 Nah. The article's not up to standards yet. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:03, 3 December 2010- Against. The pictures are not enough. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:01, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- If you like the pictures why didn't you nominate them them for VFP instead? -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
- I can't speak for M&M, except when I log on to that particular sockpuppet, but there are lots of good pics on the page collected in one place, and if the article is any good, it would compliment the pics nicely. Has anyone read it? Aleister 13:34 30 11
- I did read some of it. --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 13:38, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe you or someone who wants to can go over it and edit any rough spots, but keep the nom up unless it sucks horribly and then nom it for VFD. Let us know what you find when you read it all. But the pics are great! Aleister 13:49 30 11
- I rather like how dull the first picture is. I also read some of it and liked some of those bits. But even by my standards the format is weak and there's that horrible list.... --Sog1970 14:03, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- M&M, maybe you can go in and kill the list. I don't edit car articles. I know Sog's standards are low, but if you can lower them a bit more that would be great. And has anyone read the whole thing yet? Please tell us how it is. Aleister 14:08 30 11
- Comment. It would help the article if that list was put perhaps in the footnotes as it completely breaks up the article in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:10, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- CommentYeah I agree with that. Actually I think that this list should be deleted. So, can I delete this ugly list? --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 13:02, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- 'Tis a wiki, more or less, so go in and take care of the mess. Gunga Din. Aleister 13:15 1 12
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Nom + For Just for the pictures, it deserves to be featured. --
Nah. The article's not up to standards yet. 
