Talk:Contents
- The talk page for the old Contents page has been archived here, for all the losers that get off on flamewars.
OMG CONTENTS HAS BEEN REWRITTEN!!!!1! MY VFD WORKED!!!!-- 09:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
You. Are. GOD. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Zerotrousers is Ouroboros? >:-) —Braydie 19:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Braydie, say what you want about Ouroboros. At least I believe in Him. That's more than you can say. Oh, oh, what now?! What now, bitch? Yeah, best back off! That's what I thought, motherfucka'. What now?! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
PWN'T
- A-Hem, Manos is god, the hand of fate simply moves me to create this article and forget about his own. That is how selfless he is. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
This had better be the best article-in-progress ever, that's all I can say. *Grumble* --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
What the hell happened?[edit source]
This used to be the best page on the site! Bring back the old Contents! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- I can't believe you think the old contents was better. IT WAS CRAP!!!!-- 06:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wooooow, I Mr. Briggs Inc., one of Uncyclopedia's Blacklist first come up with better ideas for contents than sying "Contents" over and over, but now at least 2 people are pissed off by the idea. Here we go, how about an article on Caroline Munro made up of 1 thousand pictures of Caroline Munro?
- Actually, you know what... :) Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
We need the old talk page[edit source]
At the very least, restore the old talk page above this new area of discussion so that it flows better. It was classic. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- At least THIS was back! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
What about Insineratehymn's recording?[edit source]
Deleting the old article was disrespectful to him and removes a funny recording. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Note to old contents supporters[edit source]
Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents Contents. Look at me, I'm so funny! -- 15:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- *applause* --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
For all you old contents lovers[edit source]
I have an UnBook for you! Even became a Featured UnBook! UnBooks:This is a Sample Nomination! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 02:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Contents will never die.[edit source]
Not as long as I'm around. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
BLANK BLANK BLAN
- Heading for another ban, are we ZT? --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Old Contents vs. Sir Uncyclopedia equals: Contents Dies[edit source]
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 16:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the old Contents is winning, so there. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! So difficult, as both the old and new contents' suck. At least the old one was self-referential . . . -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
Because polls are fun to add. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Translated: What is the best? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Squiggle, you just voted that the New Contents is the best. Insineratehymn and I would know better. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, no, I voted new contents. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Squiggle, you just voted that the New Contents is the best. Insineratehymn and I would know better. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Can I ICU this yet?[edit source]
Pweeeease? Pwetty pwease? It's been under construction foreeeeeeeeeever and it's still just a blatent placeholder to stop the other one coming back. On the other hand, if it goes, the talkpage probably goes. Eep! Ummm... how about I make something decently meta-humourish but with actual content? Hmmm... [Thinks.] --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For contents haters[edit source]
In the interest of balance:
--Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- No it is not! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 17:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Mine is better, and more official, and awarded to people already. Ha! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- One out of three. You lose. More Uncyclopedians, at least ones who won't name themselves Uncyclopedian, love the old Contents. It's just you and three others versus something like ten of us. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Plus, I already HAVE an award for loving Contents so much, so THERE. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- One out of three. You lose. More Uncyclopedians, at least ones who won't name themselves Uncyclopedian, love the old Contents. It's just you and three others versus something like ten of us. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Mine is better, and more official, and awarded to people already. Ha! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Yes, it is. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
We need userboxes. "This user hates the old Contents and is glad that its gone, so there." and for those rightminded people among us (I only voted delete because Spang threatened to take away all my awards!!) "This user loves the old Contents and will not rest until it is restored!" I'd make em but I'm lazy. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:00, 13 May 2007
- Can't we have them both? The old one as Contents and the new as Content. I like the old one best if you ask me.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 04:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Userboxes[edit source]
OC! | This user loves the Old Contents and wants it reinstated. |
:) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:57, 31 May 2007
NC! | This user loves the New Contents and thinks it should be kept. |
:P Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Eh? And just to be even fairer...
Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC) EH?? I knew that those other ones would spring up :P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:21, 31 May 2007
Contents (Nonsense)[edit source]
In order to allow the fans of the old Contents and those who wanted it deleted, I have moved a copy to Contents (Nonsense). --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, I already did that in my userspace. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)