Forum:It's weird how some people take Uncyclopedia seriously
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > It's weird how some people take Uncyclopedia seriously
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5063 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
Case in point. And this isn't the only such case I've seen. --Andorin Kato 00:22, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I hope someone gives him the help he needs. See also Uncyclopedia:Citing Uncyclopedia. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:27, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- PS. From the title, I thought this topic was going to be about drama. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:27, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I suppose if there's demand for it...
- Ahem...
- UNCYCLOPEDIA IS THE WORST! --Andorin Kato 00:29, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- You must not have been around when that article about
Miria SarniaSonia Myriaah fuck it, that article about the Indian tennis bitch with the boobs was featured. And if you weren't, you should look it up. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 07:43, December 4, 2009 (UTC)- Sania Mirza. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 07:47, Dec 4 2009
- That page is fantastic! --Andorin Kato 07:50, Dec. 4, 2009 (UTC)
- It's actually Talk:Sania Mirza where the awesomeness is found. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:04, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
- And don't forget about Sania Mirza: A Riposte. 00:12, 8 December 2009
- Or User:Mnbvcxz/ICarly2, which was written by a vandal in response to the old iCarly article. The text itself is unedited, but I added the footnotes in response and linkified some of the words. --Mn-z 17:28, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Is it just me or is User:Mnbvcxz/ICarly2 funnier than what is in mainspace right now? It's like a sort of satire on people who take Uncyclopedia too seriously. ~ 18:48, Dec 8, 2009
- The question is, is it funny without knowledge of the 160 kb wombnewt-based article? (Which is actually much milder than 110 kb random fetish pr0n article which existed before it.) --Mn-z 20:08, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. I read that one before I read the first, and it's funnier. --Salafack 17:01, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- The question is, is it funny without knowledge of the 160 kb wombnewt-based article? (Which is actually much milder than 110 kb random fetish pr0n article which existed before it.) --Mn-z 20:08, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Is it just me or is User:Mnbvcxz/ICarly2 funnier than what is in mainspace right now? It's like a sort of satire on people who take Uncyclopedia too seriously. ~ 18:48, Dec 8, 2009
- Sania Mirza. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 07:47, Dec 4 2009
WIKIPEDIA IS THE WORST!
HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HAT! 23:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
- There is a Wikipedia? -- Style Guide 08:41, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- so ummm. this is me just spitballing, you know shot in the dark. Umm, Uncyc is the SHIIIT!--I am Justice! aka: Halsoft. 21:49, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
Do you know what's really weird?
Velcro. It makes the "shhhp" sound when you take it apart, but it's almost silent when you press it together. Think about it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:53, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know - isn't the same true of all living things with a voice, too? If you take a cat apart, for instance, it makes terrible noises. When you then (try to) put it back together, it is comparably silent. Does this mean velcro is related to living things? -- Style Guide 15:16, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Sort of. Velcro is the basic building block of life. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:31, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- That - Was - Hilarious !!! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 07:25, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
I have to admit...
...that I'm not a huge fan of pay per view wrestling. Unless it involves jelly. Pup
- Now you're just being ridiculous. Jelly can't wrestle. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:00, December 9, 2009 (UTC)