Forum:Asperger's Syndrome is no laughing matter Volume II
Continued from Forum:Asperger's Syndrome is no laughing matter Volume I
 WARNING!  |
 | This article may contain a point of view. As you read this message, Uncyclopedia editors are hard at work at tracking down the point of view to its hiding place in the suburbs of Abbottabad. Please see the irrelevant discussion on the talk page. |
This page is extremely offensive and should not be viewed by anyone! (It may even be illegal in several countries as well.)
 |
This article is likely to be pwnt by True Aspies. I suggest you run like hell or play some Civilization IV before it pwns you too. |
Our stand
Slashy, a self-righteous attitude will get you NOWHERE around here. Until you start treating US with some respect, we won't change ONE THING about that article.--<<
>> 15:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- How can I respect people who won`t respect Aspergers? Answer me that. I have been taught to treat people the way they treat me. You`ve brought this all on yourselves by being so careless and disrespectful. Don`t demand respect until you give it first. A good way to start would be to reword the article. --Anonymous Slashy
- I'll never respect a power-hungry invader like you who thinks he/she can terrorize us into accepting the yoke of obedience you think you can put around our necks. All Brad was trying to say is that if you'd followed the golden rule, maybe all of this wouldn't be happening. We might even have been more receptive to changing the article. But now we're all just having too much fun watching you have an ongoing aspie meltdown, while making the article even more offensive to watch what happens. You're the best live entertainment we've had here since BENSON. Thanks! --Hrodulf 09:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hrodulf, the whole reason why Orion started this forum was because I'd called the VFD (the golden rule you're talking about) a sham. And I've been proven right because all you lot want to do is laugh at the expense of the weak (Aspies). That's not on. This isn't terrorism - this is trying to make you lot see reason and someone rewrite the article at best (at worst delete the thing). There is now a whole heap of venting going on at the Aspie forum I mentioned and everyone is willing me to take you lot on in court - along with a number of threats that both myself and the mods are controlling (one of which has already been mentioned in this forum). I think the number now stands at about 25. It was only half a dozen 48 hours ago. You lot are being quickly outnumbered. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, BENSON is still around. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- I know, he's just not doing any more Village Dump performance art for our hilarity. --Hrodulf 15:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, he is. In his own forum. He's still as funny as ever. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Where is his forum Crazywordsman? Can you provide us with a link? Thanks. --Naughtius Maximus
F@H Woof!
MeowMUN 18:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Where is his forum Crazywordsman? Can you provide us with a link? Thanks. --Naughtius Maximus
- Actually, he is. In his own forum. He's still as funny as ever. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Forum:BENSON --Hrodulf 19:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hrodulf. I didn't read closely enough to realize you were talking about Benson instead of Anonymous Slashy, but Benson's funny, too. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 19:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hrodulf. I didn't read closely enough to realize you were talking about Benson instead of Anonymous Slashy, but Benson's funny, too. --Naughtius Maximus
- Hopefully, this page is the closest we'll ever come to having an Anon Slashy forum. And good riddance. He and uncyclopedia go together like water and cesium. --Hrodulf 20:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, cool, I'll check that out. --Hrodulf 17:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- There are people with Asperger's I have a lot of respect for. Just not you! BWAHAHAHA! --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 03:00, 25 October 2006
- There are people with Asperger's I have a lot of respect for. Just not you! BWAHAHAHA! --Naughtius Maximus
- How can I respect people who won`t respect Aspergers? Answer me that. I have been taught to treat people the way they treat me. You`ve brought this all on yourselves by being so careless and disrespectful. Don`t demand respect until you give it first. A good way to start would be to reword the article. --Anonymous Slashy
- If anything, we'll make it worse, which has already started, thanks to you. Like my dolphin picture? --Hrodulf 15:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- So long, and thanks for all the fish! --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll see you at the Resteraunt at the End of the Universe, Orion! hehehe Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- See, some jokes are funny. I am glad you caught onto that and it made you laugh. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll see you at the Resteraunt at the End of the Universe, Orion! hehehe Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- So long, and thanks for all the fish! --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I never said they weren't, Orion. Heck I don't know how I would have reacted if I wasn't familiar with Hitch Hikers. That's why I got the joke. Rewrite 04:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Freedom of Speech
Perhaps this is an alien concept to you... but people are entitled to actually write whatever the hell they like so long it doesn't contravene the laws of libel (and since the purpose of this is comedic parody, I would state that this article is protected). Creating terrorist laws? hah, why don't you pause and get a grip on reality please; nutcases blowing up buildings create terrorist laws, not comedic articles on the internet... and as far as I can see, there is a distinct lack of info on killing people in the article.
You see these people that claim various video games inspired them to kill, I'm afraid it's rubbish, in truth, a person is responsible for their own actions, and if you're attempting to claim that a person on the autistic scale isn't responsible for their own actions, then the logical suggestion would be to protect them from society and segregate them, but we of course both know that's crap.
So perhaps you might think about getting off your podium now slashy, and consider that society is better off not being mollycoddled all the time, and exposed to a bit more reality and (GOD FORBID) offensive humour rather than your padded-cell censored view of how the world needs to be. --Olipro 
Anchor KUN (Harass) 16:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Olipro, you proved yet again just how carelessness can lead to trouble - and you can`t even see it. Or you don`t want to. What do you want, World War 3? I think you do, such is your approval of careless behaviour that offends. In order to achieve peace in this world you have to be tolerant. Yes, even if that includes molycoddling (although there are limits of course). Too bad if you don`t like that, because in some cases it is needed for the greater good. That is reality. --Anonymous Slashy
- Are you genuinely some kind of idiot? World War III?
You want to see what the net result of your ideas is? go to North Korea or China where they actively censor things from their citizens.
Perhaps I should raise the point of why we fought WWI and WWII and why so many people died?
Why? for the purposes of freedom... but of course, under your little regime, we wouldn't have that, so either sod off and build your own country, or shutup and get used to the fact that people aren't going to run things how you want them to be.
See... I don't agree with what you say, but you still have the right to say it, THAT is freedom... and even though the admins have the power to silence you from the forum and delete all your comments... they're not. welcome to free speech --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 13:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- You're the idiot if you think I'm advocating extreme censorship like North Korea and China (and China are getting better with theirs BTW otherwise they would never have got the 2008 Olympic Games - they still have aways to go yet). Censorship is NEEDED - whether you like it or not. A complete lack of censorship is seen by many as open slather to offend (as advocated by Hrodulf) without any thought of the consequences. That sort of behaviour OPPRESSES THE WEAK! Which is no different to oppressing the Jews (see Hitler), the Iraqis (see Hussein), the Croats - I think (see Milosevic) - see? You want me to build my own country? Fine with me. Guess what. It will be a model country for what the world should be and it would be POPULAR! Because of it's level of accountability. You want me to do it? Throw me a few million dollars for the land and the infrastructure and I'll show you. Free speech is a myth BTW. Rewrite04:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's a nice little idealistic view you've got there, but, sadly, just like Marx's ideas... because of people and reality; doomed to fail.
- You can't permit censorship for one, and deny it for the other; if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander, and enough people would definitely exploit such a perogative to that end, and hence it is a bad idea, and not implemented in our free countries.
- I also note that you're clearly in denial since you seem to have the delusion you could run your own country... as far as I've ever seen, one person dictatorships are horrible countries, but then, I'm pretty sure Hussein though he was doing a great job.
- might I also add that you seem to be claiming that Jews are weak... I think they'd be quite upset to know that, as would Croats, and I'm also pretty goddamn sure that Aspies would be a little pissed off if they knew you thought they were weak, so I think you might want to reconsider that.
- Finally, it isn't stuff like this that oppresses, it's nutcases with power that do, which is just as well, because if you had any power, you'd have opressed our freedom of speech and deleted the article. --Olipro
Anchor KUN (Harass) 11:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Censorship requires balance, applied equally. Some things get censored no matter who says it. Other things don't. Very sensible and it protects everyone and allows as much freedom as is reasonably possible for everyone. As far as being a dictator goes - all I can say to that is ROTFLMAO! Because that is so far wrong it is unreal! Aspies are seen as weak, which is why we get targetted by abuse all the time. Just to put that in context. And the reason why stuff like this DOES oppress is because it's allowed. It puts down people who have little or no defence against such things (and they do exist whether you like it or not). It requires responsible people in power to control that - without going too far. As long as it doesn't - no problem. You seem to be scared of the weak (no matter who it is - rightly or wrongly) because you are so determined to retain the means by which they can be oppressed. And I'm talking generally, not just with this article and it's issues (which no longer involve deletion BTW - it's now about redoing it.) Rewrite 00:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Quite right, it requires balance, that is so true, and... you'll be pleased to hear that we have that balance here in the western world; since it is obviously illegal for one to go out and be slanderous or libelous, but on the flipside, a government also understands that works of non-profitable humor deserve to be protected as an institution, and hence, you'll find that the article we have is protected as such. no, we don't even need to game the legal system to get that status, any fresh lawyer will tell you that it's entitled to exist. you think THIS is oppressing the weak eh? then I think you'll crap yourself when you find out what's REALLY going on in the world. But, and I say it again, I think you're full of shit, and I disagree that Aspies think they're weak, but fortunately I happen to know of one, so I'll ask them, and while I'm at it, I'll get their opinion on the article too, so we can see whether the problem is yours because you're a whiny troll, or whether someone else agrees. Oppressing the weak? if that what it comes to, then fuck 'em, you included --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 10:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Quite right, it requires balance, that is so true, and... you'll be pleased to hear that we have that balance here in the western world; since it is obviously illegal for one to go out and be slanderous or libelous, but on the flipside, a government also understands that works of non-profitable humor deserve to be protected as an institution, and hence, you'll find that the article we have is protected as such. no, we don't even need to game the legal system to get that status, any fresh lawyer will tell you that it's entitled to exist. you think THIS is oppressing the weak eh? then I think you'll crap yourself when you find out what's REALLY going on in the world. But, and I say it again, I think you're full of shit, and I disagree that Aspies think they're weak, but fortunately I happen to know of one, so I'll ask them, and while I'm at it, I'll get their opinion on the article too, so we can see whether the problem is yours because you're a whiny troll, or whether someone else agrees. Oppressing the weak? if that what it comes to, then fuck 'em, you included --Olipro
- Censorship requires balance, applied equally. Some things get censored no matter who says it. Other things don't. Very sensible and it protects everyone and allows as much freedom as is reasonably possible for everyone. As far as being a dictator goes - all I can say to that is ROTFLMAO! Because that is so far wrong it is unreal! Aspies are seen as weak, which is why we get targetted by abuse all the time. Just to put that in context. And the reason why stuff like this DOES oppress is because it's allowed. It puts down people who have little or no defence against such things (and they do exist whether you like it or not). It requires responsible people in power to control that - without going too far. As long as it doesn't - no problem. You seem to be scared of the weak (no matter who it is - rightly or wrongly) because you are so determined to retain the means by which they can be oppressed. And I'm talking generally, not just with this article and it's issues (which no longer involve deletion BTW - it's now about redoing it.) Rewrite 00:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
And another thing: there is an Asperger's wiki. We don't go there and rant and complain about their site content. Please do us the same courtesy. We're a comedy wiki. If you don't like it, go to the Aspie wiki. Or oprah.com. Or anywhere else but here. Scram! --Hrodulf 16:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Not until I get satisfaction, Hrodulf. --Anonymous Slashy
- If I can help it, you won't. --Hrodulf 09:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can't get no satisfaction, and I'm on my nineteenth nervous breakdown. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Sorry to disappoint you, Mhaille, but I haven't had one (I've been close twice only and they scare the crap out of me so I avoid them as best I can!). Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Somebody should sue that "Shakespeare" bastard. . . look at all the violence and crimethink in his plays! Murder, suicide, poisoning, witchcraft. . . All the horrific crimes committed by theater patrons can be directly attributed to the satanic influence of this evil "Bard." Because I say so, and I also say I have a mental illness and you should believe me because if you don't I'll whine and whine and whine. . . ••••
• I 
my cat! 15:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I can't get no satisfaction, and I'm on my nineteenth nervous breakdown. -- Sir Mhaille
- If I can help it, you won't. --Hrodulf 09:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Realization
What...the hell?--Nytrospawn 16:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- For —rc (t) 02:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fore! Anyone for a good game of Golf to forget this whole situation never happened? --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm glad I clicked on that golf link! LOL Yeah Orion, you're probably right - if only this article was written correctly. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
The Late Hans Asperger For Admin
- Nom and For - For bringing us such wonderful anonymous IPs and whiners in the last two days. For those of you who don't know, he's the pediatrician who first recognized the disease, and it was subsequently named after him. Perhaps maybe the presence of his corpse at Uncyclopedia (preferably around this Halloween) will get us more support for our stand on this whine-fest. Then again, maybe not. --EMC [TALK] 18:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- For - Before the Aspie Halloweinies launch their Tor Proxy programs and blank and vandalize every page on this site on October 31st as they plan to do for a Halloween prank. Imagine an Aspie Humor Site written by Aspies who got pushed over the edge, backed into a corner, and decided to go on an Internet Rampage for revenge at the Uncyclopedia article that dared mock their syndrome. Hmmmm, can someone please make that a front page praody sometime? Thanks. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Orion, will you make up your mind? One minute you're being reasonable - the next you're being as much of a jerk as the other posters in here! --Anonymous Slashy
- Sorry the voices in my head made me post that. Are you mocking my schzioaffective disorder? --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- No of course not, Orion. Sorry if I gave that impression. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry the voices in my head made me post that. Are you mocking my schzioaffective disorder? --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
FINAL NOTE (DOH)
I have decided to leave the whining thing there - because I realised something. There IS whining going on in here. It`s just not coming from my keyboard. It`s coming from almost everyone else`s. --Anonymous Slashy
- Well, I'm glad you've finally come to that conclusion. We can all agree there is whining in this thread. As for me, I'm done feeding the troll. It's someone else's turn.--<<
>> 03:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to Anonymous Slashy
My schizoaffective disorder is acting up and I am hearing voices and trying to write funny things. I am sorry if I appear as a jerk. It is all of the stress I have gone through the past few days trying to come up with a solution and reasoning to this serious issue. All of this has been overwelming for me, and I am trying my best to get control of my illness. It has caused me a lot of confusion, and stress. So bare with me, I'll try to make adjustments. The way I get over those sorts of things is to joke about them. I hope that Uncyclopedia can settle this thing with you somehow. It would be easier to bring about world peace and perform open heart and brain surgery at the same time, than reason and settle out this issue. I have to take a double dose of my nerve pill and my anti-psychotic pill, just so I can go to sleep tonight. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 03:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Apology accepted, Orion. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
What a load!
Jesus Horatio Double-bloody-motherfucking Christ on a handcart!! Does anybody really care what this obsessive troll thinks??!? He/she/it's obviously some pathetic loser with nothing better to do with it's time than whine for hours about a condition we don't even have proof he has! It's probably some geek running around to various public terminals, making his pointless rut of a life feel better by monopolizing a whole bunch of time from a whole bunch of people. Go whine to your mommy, little boy! Go away and let the real people get on with running this site. I know a hell of a lot of Fatties that have been treated infinitely worse all their lives by thier own family and "friends" for their heinous crime of being genetically predisposed to fat, and you don't hear me whining about that article, do you? No, I took the opportunity to plaster my girlfriend's fat ass on the page, and to twist it a bit toward my point of view. . . which I don't spend hours whining about like it's the fucking gospel. There are millions of sites on the internet, if you don't like this one, (I'll say it in words of one syllable or less, so you can comprehend:) GO. . . THE. . . FUCK. . . AWAY! </outraged rant> ••••
• I 
my cat! 09:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- He may be a troll, but I think we're trolling him more than he's trolling us. At least, I am. --Hrodulf 09:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Ahhh, but it feels so good to vent, once in a while, and what a target! A self-righteous, fascist, microcephalic control-freak stroking his inferiority complex by trying to push us around. . . I mean, what a total zero! Probably lives in his mommy's basement and whacks off on underwear stolen from the little old lady next door. Awwww, poor widdle man. . . him needs to feel big and stwong, doesn't he? Someone with this bad a case of Reality Deficit Disorder should be in theology. . . or politics. Perhaps he's just disgruntled because Santa, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny won't take his calls. . . In short, what a fucking child. Get over yourself and get on with your life, kid. . . it flies by faster every year, and you never get any of it back. ••••• I my cat! 10:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- It was enjoyable, because I was standing up for our right to make fun of everything, no holds barred, and I didn't give in one inch to this guy's idiotic demands. It feels good just to be able to stand up for yourself here, even if I can't do it anywhere else. That's why it's so important to do it here, because if they beat you down here, there's really not much left of a person's freedom in this idiotic society. For more of my view on this, read UnNews:Choice of which product to buy last vestige of freedom for most Americans --Hrodulf 10:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- My reaction is a little less analytical, but for exactly the same reasons as yours, Hrodulf. I just goggled at the sheer mass of time-wastage and got pissed that this little parasite was being treated civilly, given his totally unrealistic, unreasonable attitude. Rude, I'm good at. . . and I haven't even reached mid dudgeon yet, never mind high. ••••• I my cat! 10:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- My reaction is a little less analytical, but for exactly the same reasons as yours, Hrodulf. I just goggled at the sheer mass of time-wastage and got pissed that this little parasite was being treated civilly, given his totally unrealistic, unreasonable attitude. Rude, I'm good at. . . and I haven't even reached mid dudgeon yet, never mind high. ••••
- Well, I like what you said about his dad should have jerked him off and used the next spooge instead, I'm just usually not that good with the insults. Also, whenever someone insulted this guy he seemed to like it and get all excited and throw it back at us, so I was sort of trying to avoid doing that for that reason. It's no fun if he likes it! But what you said was cool, you got him better than anybody else here. If he reads that, he's gotta be pissed off!--Hrodulf 10:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I should hope so! Especially since the only time I've actually heard it used (from a father to his own son, no less,) it led to patricide. Ahh, those were the good old days, before anonymous internet usage, where you could just go and pound the righteous shit out of fucktards like this. . . Now all we can do is amuse ourselves at their expense until they dry up and blow away, like the flakes of jism off their mother's ham-slab of a thigh after she's serviced yet another good shippin' crew. ••••• I my cat! 10:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I should hope so! Especially since the only time I've actually heard it used (from a father to his own son, no less,) it led to patricide. Ahh, those were the good old days, before anonymous internet usage, where you could just go and pound the righteous shit out of fucktards like this. . . Now all we can do is amuse ourselves at their expense until they dry up and blow away, like the flakes of jism off their mother's ham-slab of a thigh after she's serviced yet another good shippin' crew. ••••
- Wow, you're like Mozart, only with insults instead of music! Awesome! --Hrodulf 10:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I work with the public. . . mostly elderly, well-off public. Stupid fucking sheeple who wouldn't lift their lazy asses out of a chair if their lives depended on it, who look down on me because their bank accounts are bigger than mine, and that somehow makes them better human beings. , , I have to smile and be polite and helpful to these useless parasites, who'd be living in caves and shitting in their own water supply if it wasn't for people like me, who do the real work. Ah, but the silent soundtrack in my head. . . what I could say if I didn't need to whore myself out to survive in this stupid society. . . Yeah, I get a lot of practise with insults, if mostly sub-audibly. ••••• I my cat! 11:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I work with the public. . . mostly elderly, well-off public. Stupid fucking sheeple who wouldn't lift their lazy asses out of a chair if their lives depended on it, who look down on me because their bank accounts are bigger than mine, and that somehow makes them better human beings. , , I have to smile and be polite and helpful to these useless parasites, who'd be living in caves and shitting in their own water supply if it wasn't for people like me, who do the real work. Ah, but the silent soundtrack in my head. . . what I could say if I didn't need to whore myself out to survive in this stupid society. . . Yeah, I get a lot of practise with insults, if mostly sub-audibly. ••••
- Well, it's an obvious talent and probably can be put to good use here. Especially towards people like our Anon Slashy who need to have their egos taken down from the stratosphere. --Hrodulf 11:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, with 85's like him, they'll just keep re-iterating the same worthless arguments in different phrases. . . Like trying to argue evolution with an evangelist; They may even privately see the logic in it, but acknowledging it in public would destroy the fantasy that sustains them and makes them feel like they're important. Eventually, though, after a bunch of bluff and bluster, he'll get bored and move on, like all bullies. In the meantime, it's our solemn duty to illustrate unto him the finer points of his lack of breeding, genetic and mental deficiencies, probable physical and olfactory shortcomings, possible disgusting habits (I bet he eats his boogers, f'rinstance,) sexual abberations, and. . . well, whatever else we can dream up. It's an exercise for us: The sniveling little toad won't get the point, he's just too stupid. He's an idiot studying to be a moron and failing. . . miserably. Not only is he not the sharpest knife in the drawer, the boy's a fuckin' spoon! ••••• I my cat! 11:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, with 85's like him, they'll just keep re-iterating the same worthless arguments in different phrases. . . Like trying to argue evolution with an evangelist; They may even privately see the logic in it, but acknowledging it in public would destroy the fantasy that sustains them and makes them feel like they're important. Eventually, though, after a bunch of bluff and bluster, he'll get bored and move on, like all bullies. In the meantime, it's our solemn duty to illustrate unto him the finer points of his lack of breeding, genetic and mental deficiencies, probable physical and olfactory shortcomings, possible disgusting habits (I bet he eats his boogers, f'rinstance,) sexual abberations, and. . . well, whatever else we can dream up. It's an exercise for us: The sniveling little toad won't get the point, he's just too stupid. He's an idiot studying to be a moron and failing. . . miserably. Not only is he not the sharpest knife in the drawer, the boy's a fuckin' spoon! ••••
And, YES! I am being intentionally as offensive as I can towards you, you little patch of pond-scum. I figure I should point this out in case you've somehow missed it. Self-righteous little twats like you should be shot and pissed on. . . then your parents should be shot and shat on for raising such a feebleminded, vacuous, shithead. Do you understand? Your father should've jerked you off and used the next load! ••••• I my cat! 10:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh boy - anyone want to talk about meltdowns? Here's one right here! ANother candidate better suited to Encyclopedia Dramatica! At least he noticed the civility level - and then decided to turn the level down to zero. And he calls me a time waster. Hello! Pot calling kettle! Decaf! Sheesh! Tooltroll is an appropriate name and then some! Go and abuse the sysops at ED, moron. They could use the target practice! Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Do you see me wasting time being civil to you, o flatulent worm? I simply dropped the civility level to what you deserve, giving me (and Hrodulf, apparently) some much needed entertainment and, possibly, catharsis. Why deny myself the opportunity to belittle such a festering insignificant tumour as you? What you seem to have missed, with your third grade comprehension, is that my venomous flaming has helped turn you into the freakshow-du-jour. Nobody was taking you seriously halfway down the page, by which time you had already shown what an immature, inflexible, arrogant ass you were. Do you really think that a website with thousands of contributors are going to give a rat's ass about you or your opinion, when you're not willing to budge an inch? Mommy never teach you the meaning of compromise, twit? The whole issue would've been moot had you simply registered and edited the "offending" article to your liking, perhaps with some comments on it's talk page explaining your rationale. But you're a sniveling little attention-whore who wouldn't be satisfied until the entire site was aware of your alleged "condition," and then refused any and all solutions offered, and now you've, quite rightly, become the butt of the derision of the aforementioned thousands of users. How's your inferiority complex now, little toad? With a few thousand people figuratively pointing and laughing at you, you'd better get cracking on overcompensating for it. Perhaps bullying some kids in the sandbox tomorrow will take some of the sting from the fact that you are an idiotic, utterly worthless excuse for a human being, a waste of the skin which contains you, insignificant to an infinitesimal degree. By all means, do continue your feeble attempts at rebuttal; you're such wonderful abuse-fodder! You obviously think you're a wit, and I'll stipulate that you're half-right about that. ••••• I my cat! 08:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Do you see me wasting time being civil to you, o flatulent worm? I simply dropped the civility level to what you deserve, giving me (and Hrodulf, apparently) some much needed entertainment and, possibly, catharsis. Why deny myself the opportunity to belittle such a festering insignificant tumour as you? What you seem to have missed, with your third grade comprehension, is that my venomous flaming has helped turn you into the freakshow-du-jour. Nobody was taking you seriously halfway down the page, by which time you had already shown what an immature, inflexible, arrogant ass you were. Do you really think that a website with thousands of contributors are going to give a rat's ass about you or your opinion, when you're not willing to budge an inch? Mommy never teach you the meaning of compromise, twit? The whole issue would've been moot had you simply registered and edited the "offending" article to your liking, perhaps with some comments on it's talk page explaining your rationale. But you're a sniveling little attention-whore who wouldn't be satisfied until the entire site was aware of your alleged "condition," and then refused any and all solutions offered, and now you've, quite rightly, become the butt of the derision of the aforementioned thousands of users. How's your inferiority complex now, little toad? With a few thousand people figuratively pointing and laughing at you, you'd better get cracking on overcompensating for it. Perhaps bullying some kids in the sandbox tomorrow will take some of the sting from the fact that you are an idiotic, utterly worthless excuse for a human being, a waste of the skin which contains you, insignificant to an infinitesimal degree. By all means, do continue your feeble attempts at rebuttal; you're such wonderful abuse-fodder! You obviously think you're a wit, and I'll stipulate that you're half-right about that. ••••
He couldn't just be banned he was using tons of proxies. Thus we had to reason with him. --User:Nintendorulez 22:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Synopsis
For all those people who've arrived at this forum wondering what was going on and been astonished by the sheer volume of text, here's the briefest summary of the events possible: anonymous slashy, having repeatedly vandalised the page on Asperger Syndrome was graciously allowed a fair hearing by Orion (despite the fact that he/she didn't really deserve it given his actions) and put forward a relatively reasonable argument that people with Asperger's wouldn't be able to get the joke, and there was a danger of someone going on a shooting rampage as a direct result of the article (the word relatively is obviously quite necessary given the somewhat hysterical nature of this original argument) pretty much everyone laughed this off, and slashy then completely undermined his own standpoint by behaving in an utterly intractable manner and refusing to budge an inch on his demand that the page be deleted, thus bringing upon himself the full force of all uncyc users' collective scorn (which is what roughly 90% of the above text consists of) and leading Asperger Syndrome to be nommed on VFH, purely to piss him off. --Sir Jam 10:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- A couple of corrections of fact, Sir Jam. I changed the AS page once only. The rest were reverts with minor edits simply to note the revert and nothing more. The change was to note some facts in order to bring the people responsible for the article to heel. Maybe that backfired - but there was no other way as I knew the VFD process was a sham already (as argued with Orion). Now then, the claim that I undermined my argument was false. This is because I was responding to the barbs that refused to take my initial stand (noted at least as reasonable) seriously. That's the whole problem, as I have said time and time again. The refusal to take the matter seriously. Forget about any subsequent trolling by the likes of Hrodulf and now Tooltroll. The point was lost in the mire of disrespectful mirth - something that I predicted would happen and why a VFD was a waste of time. And I have offered the rewrite option BTW! So the claim that I haven't shifted from the delete this article stand is also not true. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, fair enough... I will admit, I was being a little intolerant myself in writing that, but really, the message remains the same- unfortunately (and I genuinely do mean that) most uncyc users aren't going to take you seriously now for the pure reason that you came across as being far too insistent and unmovable, as well as repeatedly stating with perhaps impossible certainty that all those who claimed to be aspies here weren't, which just inspired us to fall back onto our principles of non-censhorship far further than we would have done otherwise. I have to stress, I can see the logic in your argument... I just don't really agree that the article, as it stands (as a side not, i don't think it's particularly funny, but there you go) poses much of a threat in terms of dangerously offending aspies. --Sir Jam 10:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah well, Jam, you haven't seen the rage I have. That's why I disagree about the danger. If you'd seen it for yourself you might get the idea. It's not something that can be easily put in just words on a computer - as much as I have tried. Rewrite 00:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, fair enough... I will admit, I was being a little intolerant myself in writing that, but really, the message remains the same- unfortunately (and I genuinely do mean that) most uncyc users aren't going to take you seriously now for the pure reason that you came across as being far too insistent and unmovable, as well as repeatedly stating with perhaps impossible certainty that all those who claimed to be aspies here weren't, which just inspired us to fall back onto our principles of non-censhorship far further than we would have done otherwise. I have to stress, I can see the logic in your argument... I just don't really agree that the article, as it stands (as a side not, i don't think it's particularly funny, but there you go) poses much of a threat in terms of dangerously offending aspies. --Sir Jam 10:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- A couple of corrections of fact, Sir Jam. I changed the AS page once only. The rest were reverts with minor edits simply to note the revert and nothing more. The change was to note some facts in order to bring the people responsible for the article to heel. Maybe that backfired - but there was no other way as I knew the VFD process was a sham already (as argued with Orion). Now then, the claim that I undermined my argument was false. This is because I was responding to the barbs that refused to take my initial stand (noted at least as reasonable) seriously. That's the whole problem, as I have said time and time again. The refusal to take the matter seriously. Forget about any subsequent trolling by the likes of Hrodulf and now Tooltroll. The point was lost in the mire of disrespectful mirth - something that I predicted would happen and why a VFD was a waste of time. And I have offered the rewrite option BTW! So the claim that I haven't shifted from the delete this article stand is also not true. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and there were threats of the entirety of uncyclopedia being blanked by an aspie with a proxy generating program... that didn't really help slashy in being given a fair hearing. --Sir Jam 10:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- And I got to do some flaming! Finally! --Hrodulf 10:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A technical point
Anonymous Slashy, if you're going to use that instead of your ip stamp to sign your posts, put five tildes after it like this
"Anonymous Slashy ~~~~~" so your posts get date stamped. Thank you. --Hrodulf 10:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Here's an example of proper usage of this:
"It's not my fault that you are all intolerant hateful people with hate in your hearts who hate people with AS and want to hurt them and then claim to be them and that's just sick and you're all hateful hateful people with hate in your hearts and evil in your minds and you won't listen to me and that means you aren't real aspies because if you were real aspies you'd all listen to me and be my followers and do whatever I said because if I said no aspie could live with this article than anyone who disagrees with me isn't really an aspie. Now delete the page or I will get the sysop of the internets to sue you for forty billion dollars! Anonymous Slashy 10:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)"
See, that post had a date stamp! Correct usage! --Hrodulf 10:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Do you think he'll understand all those big words? ••••• I my cat! 11:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Big words, Tooltroll? Do you know any past four letters? ROTFLMAO Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
If he does he'll get mad, so there's no way to know for sure, since he'd get mad anyway. --Hrodulf 14:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Has anyone noticed that this?
In just a few days, this became longer than Talk:Euroipods. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Damn, you're right. --Hrodulf 22:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I cut and pasted the whole forum page into MS word, and it came out to fifty pages. That's a lot considering we didn't accomplish anything except pissing Slashy off. Oh well, at least I stuck to my guns on the censorship thing. --Hrodulf 22:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Damn, you're right. --Hrodulf 22:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe we should nominate this as a featured article. It's giga-shitloads more entertaining than Euroipods! --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 22:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'd make an image for it, but I don't know how to photoshop. But yeah, it should definitely be featured/made an article of. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I use MS Paint (and occasionally MS Photo Editor) so most of pictures suck but that doesn't stop me. So, I edited and submitted the picture near the top of the page. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 00:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- I feel the same way you do. So I have no right to complain. In fact, it's pretty good. I actually submitted several Paint images myself. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I use MS Paint (and occasionally MS Photo Editor) so most of pictures suck but that doesn't stop me. So, I edited and submitted the picture near the top of the page. --Naughtius Maximus
- I'd make an image for it, but I don't know how to photoshop. But yeah, it should definitely be featured/made an article of. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Attn: Anon guy
Your use of proxies means I can't use your user talk page. I just have a quick question. If our article offends you, how much does this offend you: (Copy and paste in your browser. Stupid spam filter) http://aspergers.on.nimp.org (NOBODY BUT ANON GUY CLICK THIS URL. It's enough to offend a normal Uncyclopedian, I want to see anon's reaction. It's related to Goa Tse, but worse.) --User:Nintendorulez 21:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- God damn. I had to ForceQuit my browser to get rid of that shit. ---
Rev. Isra (talk) 22:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- God bless the GNAA. --Hrodulf 22:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I warned you guys... Goa Tse should've been a clear sign to not click. --User:Nintendorulez 22:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll just play it safe this time. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:33, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the warning all of you - and I didn't bother looking. Is it worse that this, Nin? (Warning - this one is bad as well!) www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Pain_Series Your response please. Rewrite11:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- That depends on what you are offended by. Personally, I'm more offended by images of book-burnings than I am of images that depicts extreme gore and the infamous image of a man distending his own anus. -- 21:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm more offended by removing articles simply because one person took offense. So, whther or not it's more offensive is up to you. It's a matter of opinion. --User:Nintendorulez 19:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- ring* *ring* "Hello?" ... *mumbled speaking* ... "Nin, it's for you, someone named 'Pot' calling to complain about you calling him black."
21:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- ring* *ring* "Hello?" ... *mumbled speaking* ... "Nin, it's for you, someone named 'Pot' calling to complain about you calling him black."
- I'm more offended by removing articles simply because one person took offense. So, whther or not it's more offensive is up to you. It's a matter of opinion. --User:Nintendorulez 19:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- That depends on what you are offended by. Personally, I'm more offended by images of book-burnings than I am of images that depicts extreme gore and the infamous image of a man distending his own anus. -- 21:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- He's trying to say we're hypocrites, which is pretty funny coming from Slashy, who still hasn't apologized for comparing 9/11 to me thinking we have a right to be offensive in the name of humor. Actually, he's been kind of quiet lately. Maybe he found an interesting rock to play with. --Hrodulf 21:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Eh? Is that supposed to refer to my request to have my name removed from Euroipods? I wasn't saying the article was offensive or anything, just that having my name served no satirical purpose and was no more than a cheap insult. And it's supposed to be the pot calling the kettle black. For more information on this metaphor, see Pot v. Kettle --User:Nintendorulez 21:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, I think Slashy is saying we're hypocrites because we disagree with him or something. His argument is a little hard to follow so I could be wrong, but I think it's the "I'm wrong, but you're wrong too, so I win" argument. Rhetorical fireworks, no? --Hrodulf 21:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Continued in Forum:Asperger's Syndrome is no laughing matter Volume III