User talk:EugeneKay/Chat/archive1

Talk Page Navigation

In the interests of brevity, and to better differentiate those posts I care about from those that I couldn't give a shit about, I have split up my talk page into two sections, and given it a handy-dandy archive for old stuff. Please avoid editing my talk page directly, and use the links below to direct yourself to the correct location to drop an edit. Thanks!

Main Talk - Overview, not editable.
Chat - Talk to me, bitch, whine, etc.
Thanks - Give me an award or something

Chat Archives
Thanks Archives

EugeneKay's Records for FBI Subpeonas

April, 2007

Thanks

...for going back and actually giving a full reason why you didn't approve of the main page. We get notes like "this sucks" all the time, and all that really gives us is a little wound to the ego, and nothing is improved. I help come up with ideas on a lot of our reskins, so feedback on what, specifically works, and what doesn't helps us make better ones. Anyway, thanks again for taking the time for a full critique.--<<>> 20:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

De nada. I'm going to go try to funny something up. I was just reading the Wikipedia article on Operation Enduring Freedom, and I had to check to make sure it was actually wikipedia. Work commences!

Thanks

Thank you for the "ignorable policy" link you sent me. I will factor this into the audit. Please be assured that, despite the way you (this site) have created flexibility on rules, we will make our testing successful. According to the time, the audit will begin at 9:25 PST. At a last resort, you can assume that all posts by this username are for the audit at that point. Thanks again! --MediaWikiAuditor^{send me questions regarding audits} 04:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

lulz

May, 2007

Nobody said anything to me.

June, 2007

Still silence on the talk page.

July, 2007

VTech Reviewed!

JoshHJ has successfully reviewed your article you submitted to Pee Review. Any questions or comments can go to his talk page. Hopefully you will enjoy! Need more editing or reviewing? Ask for it on my talk page!I'll help with creating articles also.

The Review

Your article is pretty good just expand on it.

Signature

Hate to be an ass, but your signature's gonna have to change. Nothing personal, mate, but the superscripts and subscripts are frowned upon. They make the line larger than 12px, which is bad. Just fix it before Famine gets here. That way it'll be better.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem, and you're not an ass. Pardon me for not knowing the customs, or reading the rules.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Barhah!

This user looted Caiger Mall S/he spent 20 Action Points searching. All s/he found was this lousy template. Caiger Mall was then attacked and Ransacked by Zombies.

Add to userspace. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

K.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

Hey

In Urban Dead, please add "The Uncyclopedian Forces" as the group you are in. Thanks. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 14:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Still looking for Oscar Wilde?

The old version is located in the history of the Uncyclopedia mirror site. Hope this helps. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works

Bitch-in.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      15:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

August, 2007

Name change?

Please edit using User:Ekashp or come and identify on irc to confirm you really are changing your name. Just a precaution.

Please do this now, or you'll be blocked until you do. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:34, 05 Aug 2007

Oh, I see where you requested it now... whoops! Well... carry on. *runs off and pretends this didn't happen* • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:46, 05 Aug 2007

Hehe, Spang's on the warpath! :P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:44, 05 August 2007

So am I good now? Do I need to leave a UnNews about it?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      13:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, Ekashp

I'm so indifferent toward your name change, it's positively...something. Carry on.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I just didn't... feel right... as ekashp. This feels oh so much more natural.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      13:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

September, 2007

Thinkerer?

With regards to the VFH vote... can I ask what you meant? Apparently you'd rather I wasn't Thinkerer... who or what-ever that is. --MrMetalFLower 13:53, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

External link on Chuck Norris VFH page

EugeneKay -- Whilst attempting to add a comment to the Norris vote I kept getting a message claiming the the spam filter would not allow posting of the topic because it detected the letters "http:/www.fuck". This was part of your post on www.fucknorrisfacts.com. I changed your post slightly to eliminate the external link and thus circumvent the spam filter, without (I hope) changing the informative nature of your comment.

I apologize for changing a comment you had written. I don't know why others haven't mentioned the difficulty with the spam filter -- perhaps the key was added after other posts had been completed and mine was the first to try to resave the postings. ----OEJ 19:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. Thanks for letting me know. I've gone ahead and changed it back to being an external link. Silly spam filters. Spam is for kids!     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   20:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)  

Oh right

Okay, hahaha. I was thinking "what's going on here? I don't know this person" lol. Oh well, thanks for clearing that up... i'll remember that in future. =P --MrMetalFLower 08:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hnng. Must be monday.

Ah crap, I posted my thanks in completely the wrong place. Oh well, at least the sentiment's in the right place, eh? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to UnNews

I just met you on IRC today, so I feel I owe you this: Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

On your knees, worthy one! The Right Reverend Major Sir Zim_ulator blesses you. Your blessings are increasing exponentially. In the name of Sophia, the Church of Uncyclopedia and the Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic, kneel and receive the melding of Zim's holy axe and your wetware. Now go write me a good UnNews article. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:48, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."

Welcome to UnNews, EugeneKay/Chat, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.

I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.

Good things that can happen to you

---

You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.

What happened to my article?

---

If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.

Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.

Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?

UnNews Audio

---

If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.

UnNews UnFunnies

---

At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.

This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC) Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks. I suppose. Even though I have nothing to do with UnNews.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   04:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)  

October, 2007

Cabal

In response to you comment on my user talk page:

In reference to your editing of Cabal, I have this to say: making an edit for the sole purpose of sending a message is childish, stupid, and annoying. If you'd like to have a conversation over the issue, consider the article's talk page or perhaps even my talk page, as I was the one to revert your edit. While I do recognize that the option you added was an edit likely made in good faith, the follow-up edit for a comment was definately in poor taste.

Please note that I do not have your talk page on my watchlist, so please leave any reply here. Thank you.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   16:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)  

Call it what you want and insult me if you like. I'd merely say that getting uptight about the way in which I conveyed my point to you, as distinct from the point I made, makes you seem utterly absurd to me. SmackBot 16:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way, you spelt "definitely" incorrectly. SmackBot 16:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Here you are, but it's not for spelling. SmackBot 17:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Vote for Head Removal Power Rangers!

Dear Sir/Madam/Fungus/Hydrogenous beings,

The article by EugeneKay Enzo Aquarius, Power Rangers, has been nominated on VFH. Please take action and vote with a friendly FORE!. Thank you for your time.

(Vote against and I'll sick Rita on you with her putty patrol)

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   15:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)   Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 15:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

VFH/Virginia Tech Massacre

Do you really think it's a good idea to threaten a user with banning so as to suppress criticism? We all prefer our own opinions but we have to put up with others'. Suppressing them doesn't change them.

Let's clear this up. What I am against is hanging a story on a shock headline when the story doesn't follow up. The notion of portraying a deplorable sequence of events as a choreographed play may be a good idea, but this example doesn't do justice to either the idea or the subject matter. What people will go there for is the headline and that's all they'll find. The result will be negative conclusions, outrage, and some hurt feelings.

The same applies to many other references to other shocking subjects, and the passage of time doesn't make it better. If the work uses controversial subject matter to no apparent advantage, then it's damaging; to the reader, the writer and the Uncyclopedia concept.

If you wish to express your views about my motives in future, then please use my talk page, as distinct from being seen to intimidate me. SmackBot 08:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I am not an administrator here, and I therefore cannot ban you. So there is no "threat" of a ban. There is a snide comment expressing my opinion that you should be, however.

Personally, I would rather laugh over any subject like this one than cry about it. If you are dumb enough to click on something that is obviously going to be offenseive, you deserve to be scarred. This is the internet - you do not have to listen to people who are insensitive - you can go elsewhere. If you do think the concept is good, work on it some, or offer ways to better it. That's what the Pee Review system is there for.

Besides, just putting Against without a comment is perfectly allowable in the VFH rules, and is always less controversial.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

Thank you for your considered response. Regarding your final suggestion concerning controversy, I prefer to express my point of view and shall continue to do so. SmackBot 18:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Worst. System. Ever.

Your "talk page" confuses me. Make it stop...

Anyway, actual business. I don't know what/if you were thinking when you left this note on L's talk page:

As the original author of this article I strongly request that it is restored to the previous
revision, which was met with widespread approval.

I'm thinking that this is a misfire, but what was it intended for, if anything? —Hinoa talk.kun 22:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

L's signature is a hot-button issue. I am of the belief that it should have the hidden link so people can tell who the HELL is posting when he does without having to look through the history for the exact diff. If you look at the history for the sig, I created it for him with that, but he took the link out. I let it lay, because it is not MY sig, but the recent edit & revert made it send me a pair of e-mails(his sig is on my watchlist... don't ask). Anyway, I was just sending him a message that I don't like it, but "on the sly", so to speak.

As for the talk page, it's simple. Read the yellow box. Click the appropriate button. Read the header at the top. Click the appropriate link. I'll try to make it clearer. The reason it's at User:EugeneKay/Talk instead of User talk:EugeneKay is so the "no editing" tab-replacement works correctly. Long story involving double redirects, honest.

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

1. Why not just use his talk page?
2. For that matter, why not use your talk page rather than this convoluted system of subpages?
3. I remember L saying that he likes his sig that way because it keeps him off the slut list. Splarka had his sig the same way, for that matter. It's in his namespace, so I'm of the opinion that what he says, goes. —Hinoa talk.kun 22:26, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

1. Tried the talk page, he didn't like it. It's supposed to be a joke, if you stop and think about the absurdity of me asking for a revert-protect etc on a User: article not my own...
2. It's not convoluted, it's split up into Chat and Thanks and Awards. I've re-worked the notice at the top for it to be more obvious. The reason I created the sub-page to begin with was my massive voting on VFH and the subsequent awards it generated, which crapped up my Talk page.
3. I know. See the fact that it's a joke and a ribbing. As for the slut list, you can always just pretend it doesn't exist...

    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

VFH/cancer

See also User talk:Cajek

Hey Eugene, I'm here to please. Tell me how I can improve it for the mainpage, if you would be so kind. --  Le Cejak • <-> 23:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I cleaned it up a little. Getting rid of images: I suppose that's what you mean, right? I would like some feedback, just so that I can make this article the best it can be. :D --  Le Cejak • <-> 01:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I've posted my list of suggestions for Why?:Cancer is Great, as you requested.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   02:57, 25 October 2007 (UTC)  

OOF! Okay, which things would I have to do in order for you to abstain instead of just "hating" the article? --  Le Cejak • <-> 03:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Uh... all of them? The easier problems are the most glaring ones(#'s 1, 2, 5, 6, 7). Items 3 & 4 are really major rewrite requirements, while the rest are just ugly-factors. Do all but 3&4 and I'll call it even.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

Lord, nevermind. Lighten up a little, dude: I worked too hard on this article to see it fail because there's a poll at the end! --  Le Cejak • <-> 05:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

It's a real shame, too. --  Le Cejak • <-> 05:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Eugene, take another look at it. If you don't like it, you can always just abstain. --  Le Cejak • <-> 18:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Still no.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

November, 2007

Cabal 2: There is No Electric Boogaloo

Judging that the VD post hasn't been edited in several days, I assume that nobody cares anymore. However, I still want this cabal thing resolved. We need to come to a compromise. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 09:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep <choose><option>, change the external links as you please. Deal?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   14:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)  

By <choose><option>, do you mean all the subpages mashed into the first page? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 15:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I do. The whole click-for-subpage thing just doesn't work for me. Maybe even just and edit page link for the external link, I dunno.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   02:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)  

Well, the <choose><option> doesn't really work for me. The same goes for the people in the village dump. However, I have a one simple solution:

• We keep the <choose><option> stuff, but the links that you are supposed to click on actually refresh the page. Eventually, you will come to one of the options where the link goes to Cabal@home.

How does that sound? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I like it!     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   08:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)  

title vs wrongtitle

I'm well aware of the existence of {{title}} and I use {{wrongtitle}} as a matter of preference. Thanks for caring, though. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

*points to edit summary*     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

What about the edit summary? --Sir gwax (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

*headdesk* It was a joke. A "how-do-yo-do" kind of thing. Trying to get to know the "new" old-sysop.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

Ah, fair enough. My response was motivated by the fact that a number of people have made that change on my user page on more than a few occasions. Maybe I should leave a comment in the code telling people not to mess with it. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

But then how would us troublemakers who immediately realize the point of it all get to screw with your head?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

ICU

Hi Eugene, I've noticed you're putting ICUs or pages still being worked upon. Generally speaking, try to avoid it, since the WIP gives you "immunity" vs. ICU, and will be deleted anyhow after 7 days once the WIP expires. You might scare off noobs that actually try to write :) Thanks! ~ 09:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, there is no need to move valid WIP pages to personal pages. That's what the WIP tag is for....~ 09:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

My bad. *goes back to doing nothing at all*     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   09:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)  

I put them on my watchlist, wait and see if the honourable new user removes the WIP after doing more work, than slap the ICU on the bugger. :-) RabbiTechno 10:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... (watchlist grows exponentially)     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

I didn't mean that you shouldn't do anything, any work here is welcomed. Just wanted to let you know about those two pointers.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has awarded you a Nuclear missile Now go and destroy the The Zionist Entity This Template Will Self Destruct in seconds

~ 10:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

I understand. However, I believe that "It's better to do bugger-all perfectly than to do everything all buggered up". But thanks for the missiles! I like them! But they go over there. It's alright, though, they can stay here for a bit.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

Sigs

I am looking for some help with my sig. I see that you have got a sort of sub-template thingy in yours for the date and time, so that you can format them along with the rest of your sig. This is what I'm trying to go for here, but I'm not really sure what I'm doing. I think I've got it to work, but my question is do you have to manually type in the date and time every time you sign something, or is there a way to do this automatically? TIA, -- Spillin DylanTALKEDITS 18:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

I've updated my sig page with an explanation for handy-dandy sig-theft purposes. Let me know if you need any more guidance.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   22:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)  

Can you count?

I see sixteen articles on VFD. You added the sixteenth. Technically, I'm supposed to ban you for a day, but I don't feel like it. Can you pretend to be banned instead? Oh, and could you try not to do that in the future? Thanks, —Hinoa talk.kun 23:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Wait, fuck, nevermind. —Hinoa talk.kun 23:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

FU EDIT CONFLICT. I was about to say that Crap was listed as kept by cs1987, but you beat me to it. And can I have a short ban anyway?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)  

If you insist. —Hinoa talk.kun 23:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Oooh, that tickles! "Thank you, sir! May I have another!"     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)  

ICU Tags

Sorry, dude. I thought you just removed the ICU tags after fixing up an article. Ill put the construction tag on now, but it would help if you told me specifically where the article is going wrong. - Blammo77

Change your vote?

Brazilian-Amazon Rainforest is now Why?:Destroy the Rainforest. :-) --EMC ^[TALK] 23:03, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Noted, and changed.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)  

Garry's Mod

Eugene, I saw that you stuck an ICU to my Garry's Mod article. I'm not sure what you meant by "integrate with Half-Life". --Crazee Boy, OMGFURRY

Well, the topic is a half-life mod, and it's relatively unkown to the general populace. The subject is worthy of, at most, a section in the Half-life article, unless you can find some genius concept to make it long enough(and funny enough to the general readers). My suggestion is to condense it down into 3 or 4 paragraphs, drop the conversations, and put it somewhere in Half-life. Then blank Garry's Mod and turn it into a redirect to that section of the half-life page. I understand that some things are funny at the time, but aren't easy to explain. I've done that kind of thing myself. Please let me know if you need any help with wiki-code, etc.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   17:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC)  

66.108.194.12 on Logical Fallacy are Vaild?

Re-your comment on my talk page... Sorry, but I can't find either the user or the page you are talking about, though I'm new, and may be mistaken, I'm not watching many pages, so will leave it up to you... Thanks MrN 11:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Model 94 Winchester

First of all, thanks for not killing my article Model 94 Winchester yet. Second of all, what do you think it needs? I kind of thought that it was long enough and funny enough to get by on its on accord. If you think it needs help, I'll try, but I'm at a bit of a loss for further ideas.

Thanks,

  --MaddMax 20:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Kate Smith and tag

As a courtesy, I am letting you know that I am still working on Kate Smith and have removed your "ICU" tag. I will seek the counsel of my inner circle to punch up the article.

In the future, as a courtesy, could you let the creator know that you are placing such a tag on the entry? It would also be helpful if you could indicate on the articles talk page what you do not find funny about the article as variety of reasons may impact your opinion that can be addressed, if relative.

Personally I reserve the ICU tag for entries that are workable, but lack complete sentences, ideas or are totally written in a sophmoric tone by blind IP's. But thats me.

Thanks! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Interesting choice...

So... you comment that you would have QVFD'd something as you're voting for it for feature at VFH, and thereby call your QVFD instincts into question at the same time. Not the way I would have gone, but hey, I never did any work around here so I never had any regrets for any work that I did.  :)--<<>> 13:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

*headdesks* I said it's been greatly improved since the QVFD instinct struck me. The only reason I didn't QVFD it to begin with was my respect for the original author. So, it makes a lot of sense, actually. At least, I think so. Of course, I never write articles around here anyway, just bitch about 'em.  :-p     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

:) Hehe, just giving you grief, dude.--<<>> 23:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Just making you look like an imbecible, man. It's all good.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)  

Chat for December, 2007

You're Whining Has Been Replied

Click here for your reply--Æ 00:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Uh, that's okay

Yeah, when you're voting, maybe you shouldn't just say that the article sucks or something. Maybe, instead of being a dickwad, you should explain yourself. But that's cool. Whatever.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 01:24)

Ya know, instead of calling me a "retard".   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 01:25)

I presume you're referring to VFH/Normal. Well, the article is in the wrong namespace. It reads like an Unbook, not a mainspace article. That's annoying. And I didn't like the article, even assuming it was in the right namespace, so it would have gotten a Abstain. If you think that it's a personal attack, well, thats your problem. I don't even check article authors when I vote, just how well they're written. Voting for just because "it's another {{username}} classic" is stupid, and a failure of the system.    EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   01:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)  

I noticed you vote against everything. Smooth.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 02:08)

Lies. I voted for UnNews:Liberal insurrection heroically crushed. And UnPoetia:Your "Eau aip Ods". AND UnScripts:Emergency Room. And some others. But, again, I default to against.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

I'm over it. I just needed to get it off my chest I guess. It's just kinda annoying, you know? You can kinda see where I'm coming from, right?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 15:18)

Yah, I can. It's just not what's at work. Of course, I've seen people banned for this kind of thing. FU SYSOPS     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)     

I've been banned for everything under the sun. I might as well get banned for this too, right? Put in a request and don't forget to sign the release papers.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 9 / 16:24)

Consider it done, just for you.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   23:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)  

Um, you realise he was already nominated???--Æ 23:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, didn't see that. Maybe this makes him twice as likely to be banninated?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   01:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)  

Merry Xmas!

Bonner would like to wish you a Merry Christgame And a happy New Game P.S, You just lost the game (Bonner) (Talk)

Christmas!

I just wanted to wish yew a faggy christmas! I mean... merry. Well, Bonner keeps beating me to it. Oh well, hopefully it's not lessened. have a great christmas! Honest, I meant merry! ~Fag x FS

Have a not-shitty Christmas!

	Heya, The Led Balloon here, wishing you merry Christmas, or any other holiday you feel like celebrating. Just remember what it's all really about: NO WORK, NO SCHOOL, FREE STUFF!!!
	Here's to hoping your school(or work) calendar for December doesn't look too much like this...

Merry Christmas, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:49, Dec 17

Bloody Pagans

Pagans, the Whole Lot of Yous Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game.

XMas

	AE has awarded you a beer in which you help build your own Christmasbeerbottletree (shown right)
	Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

...even though your VFH tastes need to improve--Æ 02:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

One Of These

	HEY LOSER! Here's another semi-personalized (that's a lie) Merry Christmas template to add to the overwhelming pile you've got building up on your talk page right now. Have a Merry Christmas, or I'll come over there and make you have a Merry Christmas.
	If you don't already have a pile of these building up, you're a hopeless loser that nobody on Uncyclopedia likes...sorry. Yours truly, RAHB

Happy Holidays or some such -RAHB 03:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas. ~ Mitch

-- Mitch 13:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

NoTM

Uncyclopedia:Noob of the Month Here's the link sir. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 01:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

January, 2008

IRC

Really, no need to be continuous with the hate hate hate... ~Formerly Annoying Crap 05:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Signature

Hey EugeneKay,

I've just made your life easier.

Smack this into signature field for preferences, and sign with ~~~~ to see the results!

{{subst:User:EugeneKay/Zig2}}

Enjoy! — Sir Manticore 09:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

GTFO!

SHOW ME YOUR TITS! Thanks for voting my tits to the front page. -Zana Dark

Wow

Good to know that there aren't cockheads overseeing every movement made around here like on Wikipedia, deciding what's useful and what's not on a whim and arriving upon revelations such as that if it doesn't have a picture it's shit. Equally good to know that no matter how fun something sounds like it ought to be someone else will find a way to ruin it for people who aren't them.– Preceding unsigned comment added by Primeoffense (talk • contribs)

Response on your talk page. Let's keep this one there, eh?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   22:03, Friday 18 January 2008  

November, 2009

Alec Baldwin

Was there anything in particular that you didn't like about the article, or was it just the fact that it wasn't written by you? --Matfen 11:42, November 16, 2009 (UTC)