Uncyclopedia talk:Collaboratory
(Redirected from User talk:MrN9000/Whorehouse)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Anyone got any comments about this idea? MrN 00:18, Jun 15
- The first person who actually had a separate page for whoring was YTTE, and I think he did a good job. This is more advanced and with rules and stuff, but it's a good idea. Some people think whoring articles is bad, but I say to them that everyone whores if they have to. If you have 30 features like Mooses or something you don't have to whore anyway. • <0:25, 15 Jun 2008>
- Well, this is a page for everyone to whore to everyone. That's the idea. With the emphasis being on people making contributions to the articles of others. If you don't want others to edit your pages don't list them here. If you don't want to view the pages others are working on, don't come here. I'm hoping that this page will actually reduce whoring in places like the village dump and on talk pages. MrN 00:43, Jun 15
How do we stop the Whorehouse from going bankrupt?[edit source]
Any ideas? -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 22:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Start a forum topic demanding that it be put in the toolbox. That would delight everyone.
- Hehehe - good idea!... oh! maybe if we also offered actual whores, we would get a lot more visitors! (for a price, of course) -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 04:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ahem... lame jokes aside, if we could just get more people to visit and USE the whorehouse, then it would be much more apreciated. And how do we do that kids? Kids: SPREAD THE WORD! That's right! This, perhaps? (if you can think of a better message to put in, please do replace it) -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 19:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Write a story for the UnSignpost. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:04, Jul 29
- Great idea! Any takers? (I'm not much of a good writer so...) -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 20:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ask GerryCheevers to do it. He's been writing a lot for UnSignpost. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- "Need to get off? MrN9000 can give you a hand with that!"
- HAHAHAHA! GENIUS!!! -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 20:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
20:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- "Need to get off? MrN9000 can give you a hand with that!"
- Ask GerryCheevers to do it. He's been writing a lot for UnSignpost. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Great idea! Any takers? (I'm not much of a good writer so...) -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 20:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Write a story for the UnSignpost. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:04, Jul 29
22:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Chaps, it's awesome that you think this can/should work...
- Hyper: your HowTo:Whore your article on VFD is inspired. That's exactly the message I'm trying to get over. All this "No whoring" shit has got to stop. It's not helping the wiki.
- Regret: that template looks awesome to me. Keep it in your userspace, but I can see no harm in it. What are people going to do? Complain that you are whoring the whorehouse? What do you think we can do with that template?
- Wood: Where the hell did you just spring from (4th edit conflict!!!)
- Led: I was thinking along those lines... I think that Forum:Pee Review and How It's Changed Uncyclopedia, Forum:Need a quick PEE? and maybe even Forum:A very short rant on the state of affairs of VFH featuring a very concise solution are related to this page. I'm going to leave it a few days for the mania to settle down over at those forum pages, and then I'm going to jump into action. Basically, I think the whorehouse needs to advertised in some more prominent places around the wiki. Probably, with a combination of Pee Review and the Whorehouse working in tandem we can get some more collaboration going. That's my wish anyway. An article in UnSignpost would obviously be a really good idea. I'm just trying to figure out the fine points of how this page and Pee Review can work together before hand. I think it needs virtually no changes to anything other than changing some text on the main UN:PEE page, and getting people to treat the process a bit differently... MrN 20:17, Jul 29
- MrN: I'm fucking everywhere. I'm like slime. I slowly seep into any small crack someone leaves in the wall until I fucking own the place. So...I'm trying to own the Whorehouse talk page? I'm not actually sure where I'm going with this one. How about I'll answer your question with, "I'm awesome", and leave it at that. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 20:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Chaps, it's awesome that you think this can/should work...
- hello gents, signpost junior reporter here looking for a scoop. does anyone have any thoughts on the whorehouse? concerns? criticisms? success stories? anectodes about losing your virginity? 20:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure everyone thinks this whorehouse idea is a good one. Some people have (I think) suggested opposition to it. Although, I don't really understand them. MrN 20:55, Jul 29
- *sigh... I remember the time I lost my virginity. Except I don't. 'Cause I didn't. :( -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 21:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure everyone thinks this whorehouse idea is a good one. Some people have (I think) suggested opposition to it. Although, I don't really understand them. MrN 20:55, Jul 29
Collaboration template[edit source]
Why didn't I think of this? How come MrN gets all the good ideas? Damn bastard • <18:47, 21 Aug 2008>
- The team of MrN9000 and Dr. Skullthumper will not be stopped! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:53 Aug 21, 2008
- Yeah, but I'm still your favorite bot, right Skull? • <18:54, 21 Aug 2008>
You know what would be an awesome name for this?[edit source]
- (Collab•Laboratory)
-- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Right[edit source]
So this puppy is up again. I got rid of the DPL and the template cos it sucked balls and went back to the older format but well, like it is now. Feel free add your stuffs... MrN 01:31, Aug 12
"Drawing board" redirect[edit source]
Do we still need the redirect from Uncyclopedia:Drawing board? The similarly-named process on Wikipedia has been flagged as inactive. ----Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 22:57, January 2, 2013 (UTC)