User:Kelpan/yak
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- Nope, sorry. I don't like going against VFHs, but this one just doesn't do it for me.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Short and kind of irritating. Like me. But short. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Against. Okay, so the idea is funny. And the execution is also pretty good--using unexpected words like "sojourn" and such--but come on, it's like 10% of the length of a decent article! If that. (In other words, for if lengthened.) --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- no me gusta nada This article is shit and what is the recent obsesion with canadian articles on VFH!
Weasel 3689
02:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC) - Against --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- No thank you. --EMC [TALK] 03:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. I almost nominated this one for deletion. Rogpyvbc 04:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Usually I like stuff like this, but this one is just... not even remotely good. --So So 07:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- No. Ikabu 08:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- I would rather fuck spang Madretsma 20:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not to say I don't find it funny, but I believe it promotes a type of humor that may be misinterpreted if featured on the main page. Do you really want a bunch of IPs making pages like this? Results could be life-threatening. Like the article, but not as a featured. --THINKER 21:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC) - --Kelpan 08:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Against. How the hell can this be featured? 21/04 10:19
- Against Too short, unfunny and pretty much pointless drivel. Ethereal 12:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Not clever or funny. Matt lobster 17:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - This shit wouldn't pass VFD. --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
