From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnBooks:Hergé's Erotic Adventures of Tintin
|
Score: -2 boy wonders
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister in Chains
|
For: 3
|
 Nome and Fleur Found this while wandering Random pages. One of M's (guess which M) older pages has a certain class to it that has been missing from my life. Very good writing and comedy from a bygone (2007) age. Aleister 21:42 8 9- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:33, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:29, 9 September 2010
|
Against: 5
|
 Against. This article just doesn't feel finished; it doesn't really flow and its points seem half made, or some such. That, and it's not erotic enough. ~  (talk) (stalk) -- 20100909 - 00:18 (UTC)- Against. Isn't an UnBook usually a book, rather than merely being about a book? Namespace concerns aside, I just didn't think it was all that funny.
 pillow talk 23:10, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Unbook? This is barely enough to fill a hardcover sleeve. Not impressed, it has potential but got a lot of work to do. Dr. Fenwick 06:48, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. This is just... wrong... just very, very... wrong. Gomphog 12:17, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Feels like it's waiting for the author to add the good bits. Also feels like those good bits could be pretty good, if he ever got around to adding them. --UU - natter
 13:41, Sep 10
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain. It reads like a summary of the book rather than the full monty. 'Shirley' there's more here to tap into Mhaille?
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:55, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 Abstain. I agree with Romartus. It doesn't have the feel of an UnBook. Its also very short, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just didn't help in this case.  Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 16:49, September 9, 2010 (UTC)- Mhallie mentioned that it's not one of his better pages, I just happened to like it. So if the nom falls under it's own weight, my bad, not the author's, who didn't know it was being nommed. Aleister 23:33 9 9
- Its not often that I'm inclined to vote against one of my own articles but in this case I'm inclined to agree with most of the points raised. VFH should be for those articles that we think reflect the best of our work, although this is a solid little piece I don't view it as my best quality work, I'd sooner have seen things like Bi-curious George, Politically Incorrect Pantomimes or numerous others here ahead of Tintin, which even I considered in need of some extension. I'd like to thank Al for nomming it though, its always nice when someone thinks that one of your articles even deserves to be placed here. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Nome and 
Against. This article just doesn't feel finished; it doesn't really flow and its points seem half made, or some such. That, and it's not erotic enough. 
Abstain. I agree with Romartus. It doesn't have the feel of an UnBook. Its also very short, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just didn't help in this case. 
