Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Be a Good Catholic

Article: HowTo:Be a Good Catholic	Score: -3 Blasphemers
Nominated by:	Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 18:02, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
For: 1	Nomand4 As I'm on the hot streak of features... I will try this one. I think it's a good one. The Polish version got featured and after I had written the English version, the Spanish one was created and it's a translation from English - that means they liked it enough to translate. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 18:02, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 4	Alright, I gave it a look - self-nom after apparently ignoring rather major flaws pointed out in a low-scoring review; that's pretty much an automatic against from me. 1 2 3 4 ~ 20:23, 19 December 2010 Against. This isn't bad, but it could be a lot better. For one, a lot of the "lists" can be easily improved by just removing the bullets and slightly rephrasing things here and there. Your English isn't top notch either, so maybe you should ask someone to proofread this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:01, 19 December 2010 Nah Not a fan of huge lists. Not anymore at least – Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwillkillyou333 (talk • contribs) Against. Mostly listy -nneds re-working to be less so. Also needs a heavy proofread. Basically, what Chief said in his review. --UU - natter 14:02, Dec 20
Comments	It's been pee reviewed twice. `Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 18:02, December 19, 2010 (UTC) First and second reviews if anyone's interested. Mind, I'll actually read it... and them... and stuff later; Ptok's lack of formatting was just irking me. 1 2 3 4 ~ 18:19, 19 December 2010 Comment. As much as I'm guilty of writing lists - this is over the top Funny bony 20:04, Dec 19 20:04, December 19, 2010 (UTC) Comment. It tries to cover a lot of ground - hence the lists. It could do with a haircut and some tighter editing. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 09:23, December 20, 2010 (UTC)