From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: History of Woman
|
Score: 2 simulated sexually explicit photographs
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister in Chains
|
For: 6
|
 Nom & For. User Pieface, with a recent assist by Romartus, gave Uncy a quality page of classic beauty and grace. Woman have done a few good things, Pieface researched day and night to find them, and the least we can do is share these few things with an unaware world. Aleister 14:00 4 11- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:22, 4 November 2010
- For.--Funnybony
   14:40, Nov 4
- For. --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 15:03, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. thoroughly researched! --Sog1970 22:53, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Laughed really hard at points. Dr. Fenwick 03:25, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. I think this is just so incredibly overlong and unfocused. It made a lot of references to obscure events that few people are familiar with, and it's peppered with irrelevant pics with captions that seem to try to squeeze them akwardly into the article. The unabashed sexism of the lede made me laugh, but the longer I read, the less and less I liked it, until eventually I just figured I'd read enough. Features should leave you wanting more, not less.
 pillow talk 06:21, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- What Hyperbole said. That, and just plain unimaginative at times... tsk. Might as well ditch those entirely. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 06:24 (UTC)
- Against. It was ok but having re-read it again, it does go on too long and looks a bit ranty in the end. I was going to work on it but I think this nom is premature. Sorry
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:28, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. I think Hype's on the money with this one Sycamore (Talk) 21:47, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Nom & 
