Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Beat Shaq

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

HowTo:Beat Shaq[edit source]

I've been on an Aaron Carter binge recently. This came out of it. Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:18, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Humour: 7 It's good, however, maybe there could be more jokes per square inch, but I lolled at the quotes that would make Shaq shit his pants.
Concept: 9 Definitely a great concept. The whole idea that Shaq could be such a pussy is genius! The alignment of neurons in your brain was excellent.
Prose and formatting: 8 You certainly have great grammar, maybe the only critic about formatting would be that the words "Contingency plan" look like they're getting raped by the pic on the left. :P Maybe just shrink the pic a bit? But I am being a maniac here.
Images: 6 Sorry, but the images did not make me laugh, but I guess it is because I like raw, offensive humor. They support the text nicely however.
Miscellaneous: 7.5
Final Score: 37.5 All in all good article, the concept is da bomb. The writing is top-notch. First time I'm reviewing an article, I hope that helped!
Reviewer: Mattsnow (talk) 22:34, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the positive review! I was just looking for a quick one anyway, but usually others will get annoyed with brief reviews. Talk about specifics, what works and what doesn't, what could be added or removed, all that drivel. Black Flamingo does this pretty well (though in hundreds of thousands of words sometimes), so take a cue from him. Most people do, anyway. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 05:30, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw the Gaddafi review after posting yours, and I felt really cheap! I will go deeper on future reviews. Mattsnow (talk) 08:14, April 21, 2011 (UTC)