Talk:Insert title here

[Insert award here] instead of [FEATURED!]

Exactly that, just like the morse code article. --thematrixeætsyou, the (adjective) (talk) (flames) 07:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[insert add to page here]

[insert suggestion here] [insert tags here] [insert random inside joke here] [insert insult here]

[insert bitching about signature here] [insert flame about dumb idea here] [insert signature here (199.126.227.65 01:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC))]

[Insert talk here]

Bravo! To the four of you who worked on this, CaptainSpam, Zombiebaron , 68.111.13.24, and to Guest especially, I would like to congratulate you all on an article of incontrovertible Geinius. I am humbled and jealous of your collective godlike Talents TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) -- 21:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[Insert comment praising humorous nature of article here] [Insert a couple of hypens here] [ Insert signature here ] [Insert timestamp here]

Has anyone actually used this as a template for their article? To do so, first draft type in {{subst::Insert title here}}. It works!
[ Insert gold-coloured Username with 'æ' for 'ae' here] ^{[ Insert silver-coloured link to talk page here]}_{[ Insert bronze-coloured link to contribs here]}
[Insert '18:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)' here]

[Insert some insincere words of praise here] The subscript for the orange kitty image was way too pertinent, so I took the liberty of increasing the noise factor. --di Mario 06:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[Insert link to random prank Flash] [Insert praise similar to that given to AAAAAAAAA! ] Insert name here [Insert timestamp here]

wow

pret;ty bad............................................... – Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.216.199.14 (talk • contribs)

heh

i approve --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk | Rate 22:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

[Insert gratuitous Zero Wing reference here] [Insert all your base are belong to here] --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 15:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Idea to remove repetitiveness

Yeah, this article's pretty great, particularly the way it picks up all the clichés here. That said, it unfortunately has the illusion of being a lot more redundant than it actually is, because so much of it is simply the words "Insert ______ here, insert _____ here, insert ______ here." That type of gag is actually pretty common elsewhere (" '[Insert patriotic platitude here]' said the President," etc). So I don't see if there'd be any problem if most of the words "insert" and "here" were simply removed — a simple brackets format is quite clear after the first few times of seeing them. In fact, I'm going to Be Bold and do it myself now and see if anyone complains. --Lenoxus 17:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh wait... arg..... could, um, some admin try my idea.... for like a day or two.... PLEASE? (It's currently locked, and... why do people have to vandalize something like this? WHY?!) --Lenoxus 18:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree. This page should be only semi-protected because it was vandalized by IPs. Also, instead of using "Insert ______ here", "Insert ______ " should be used. That way, we will still know that something should be inserted. --Sbluen 04:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

It works now — thanks Sbluen! You are muy cool. Lenoxus 15:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

So yeah, when you all read the article now, please tell me what you think. Keep your mind open and remember that usually the word "insert" isn't actually necessary to make it clear that "one of these is supposed to go here." Peace out Lenoxus 15:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, Sbluen, I just got your message. Thanks for the explanation. I'm wondering: could I make some of the changes you're suggesting (fixing "insert" inconcsistancies, etc.) and see how that works? --Lenoxus 20:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[Insert Sonic Rush song here]

[Insert cat and hedgehog here] -- [insert user here]

[Insert long, rambling rant of criticism about the use of this talk page about use of Uncyc talkpages with a not-caring stance that Uncyc isn't Wikipedia, littered with complaints that the above poster is bad at using the [insert stuff here] here]
~ [Insert 'Ghelae' with fake ligature here] ^{[Insert link to aformentioned user's talkpage here]} _{[Insert link to aforeforementioned user's contributions here]} [Insert '07:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)' here]

[Insert RPG boss theme here] [Insert great praise of the article] [Insert comments about the author's brilliance and how this article should be featured] [ Insert comment's poster here ]

[insert header here]

[insert greeting here] [insert indication that [insert user IP here] has read [insert articletitle here] from [insert first word here] to [insert last word here] here] [insert notification that a mistake was found here] [insert categories of [insert "Insert title here" here] here] [insert "should be" here] [insert "[insert category:"[insert category here]" here]" here] [insert greeting here] [insert anonymous user IP here] [insert timestamp here]

[Insert complaint here]

[Insert statement why Uncyclopedia isn't funny here] [Insert reason why Wikipedia is so much better here] [Insert insult about Uncyclopedia users here] [Insert further insults here] [ Insert signature here ] [ Insert talk page here ]

Oh, crap!

This article is getting out of context. some [[xxxxx]] is not in the format of [[insert something here]]. This article could use a cleanup. Any volunteers? Feureau 03:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, I can't help but reiterate my own minority view that nearly all of it should not be in the form [intert something here]. It just blurs to me, becoming like repetition, but in a way that isn't meant to be part of the joke. But I'll just keep my fingers away from that "edit" button and let everyone else do they thing... --Lenoxus 03:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Images

I added those [Insert Image Here] images, just to give it a more article-like look. Is it better now? --The Llama Llover!!! 23:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

This article SUCKS!

Which moron is maintaining this piece of crap? I feel sorry for that poor schmuck.

[insert insult here]

[Insert comment that the whining user should find something productive to do instead of saying that this article sucks here] --General Insineratehymn 18:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[Insert request here]

Could somebody please add [[pt:Insira título aqui]]? Thanks. --Matheus Wahl Who?  37,592  Portuguese 17:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

rofl

I laughed about how silly this article is, yet it still something that at least, contain content

Deepinfoood 05:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[insert meaningless title here]

This was a good article (I guess) but the person needs to read how to be funny and not just stupid. Got a few laughs (read: I laughed once at it was probably at something completely unrelated, but pretty repetitive. --Xaerun 08:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[insert comment here]

It's not as bad as the last version of that sick blah 19:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)~~ [insert random blah here] That one was really terrible

Insert woot here

Yeah my signature phrase is in it:"windswept steppes"--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 03:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

[Insert asdf here]

[Insert whining here] [Insert IROXUSUX-type spam here] [Insert vandalization of the article's discussion page here]

[Insert evil laugh here] [Insert cliché from some badly translated Japanese videogame here]

[Insert admin banning your ass here]

[ Insert hacked variable IP adress here ] 08:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC) [Insert pleasekillme here]