Forum:Vote for bureaucrats

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Vote for bureaucrats

Note: This topic has been unedited for 3083 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

It is time to elect 3 new bureaucrats for the Uncyclopedia. I nominate some people who would be perfect. Please vote for or against below.

Vote

Banzaikitten

Score: 5.5

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Sure, why not? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 01:34, Nov. 3, 2015

Cat the Colourful

Score: 17

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  For. Sounds like a good idea actually. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 18:03, 2 November, 2015 (UTC)
•  For. Sure does. 92.11.176.61 (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
• Circlejerk vote. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
• Boner. Yes. 18:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Sure, why not? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 01:34, Nov. 3, 2015
•  For. I love you so dearly. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Frosty

Score: 0.5

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Lost Labyrinth

Score: 16.5

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
• Boner. I have extensive bureaucrat experience and am easily the best candidate for this role. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
• Circlejerking intensifies Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 18:08, 2 November, 2015 (UTC)
• MOAR Circlejerk 18:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Sure, why not? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 01:35, Nov. 3, 2015

Lyrithya

Score: 17.5

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  For. <Isarra> You should vote for me, too. I'm totally useless and inactive, BUT STILL. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  For. Baby hating admins make good bureaucrats. 19:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  For. You only live twice Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 19:22, 2 November, 2015 (UTC)
•  For. MUN MyOwnBadSelf, 'I want hoverboards, and I want them now.' (talk - stalk - block) 22:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Sure, why not? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 01:39, Nov. 3, 2015

Mr-ex777

Score: 14

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Against. Hahahahahhahahahahah no. 92.11.176.61 (talk) 18:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Never 19:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Admin votes count as 5 now - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 19:38, Monday 02 November 2015 -
• Comment. Lol Colin making up rules. 19:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Lord, forgive me. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 01:34, Nov. 3, 2015
•  What is not complete without an self vote?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Olipro

Score: 0.5

•  For. 82.66.102.90 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Shabidoo's armless transgendered evil twin

Score: -1,000,000

• Strong against --ShabiDOO 16:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Nobody

Score: 100,058

• what is wrong with you people --50.182.8.254 (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
• Permaboner Frankly, we all suck. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
• I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Dunno... Maybe? 10:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

<insert name here>

Score: -31

• Magic! MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Dexter111344

Score: Winnar Losar

• I am better than all of you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Inferior 09:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Everyone (Except Anton)

Score: 1,000,000

 HELL YES 09:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Why...

Have we not bothered with the regular debate about whether we need more Bureaucrats and how many we should have, and who the fuck was the IP Address that created this page in the first place? Currently we have four Bureaucrats listed amongst the Active Admins, probably only two of which could be described as active to any great degree. If its agreed that we have a need for more I would suggest limiting the number to either one or two new ones at this time. Personally I'd even consider delaying this for a month or so to see if we can get some of our admins actually doing more on the site. Also, you all suck! :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

It's apparent admin powers have been doled out freely to tons of people despite how little they've edited. If powers are being handed out like that without anyone putting in the work fighting vandals and performing general cleanup these days, you might as well go all out and hand over the full toolbox to those people. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Out of all of them i edit the most.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

OP ALL THE FGTS ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea why we are doing this, I don't really know why we need more bureaucrats and I don't know who the IP that made this forum is. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 09:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I thought it was all a joke to be honest. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 09:42, Thursday 19 November 2015 -

Jokes? On Uncyclopedia? Never! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

We need more Admins and beaurocrats. Otherwise who will fight ISIS and defend 9-11 and ensure freedom???

Sign, and spell, (presumably) anon IP, sign, and spell. MyOwnBadSelf (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)