Forum:Vote Kalir for Grand High Pastamancer
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6149 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
If so elected, I will summon delicious noodles for all, blast trolls to Hey Deze and back with cones of ex-girlfriends, disarm the terrorists of their pants, and bomb every last one of your computers. Thank you, and good luck. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
For
Score: +3 hundred and fifty fag
- LIEKWOA Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- FOAR what are yew, pastaphobic? --(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 11:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- O RLY? -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 13:32, Feb. 5, 2008
Not for
Score: +2
- OMGNOWAI Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 03:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Against Kalir's pastamancing is sub-par at best. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Abstain
Score: +1
- I'm watching my carbs. They haven't done anything so far. They're just waiting for me to fall asleep, probably. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. - HAHA how do you think up this stuff Modus?
- Also comment. The back of cereal boxes. It's all right there, man. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Feb 5, 19:03
Against Boomsta's ability to just haphazardly remove Squiggle's patriotic right to participate in the democratic process that is otherwise known as voting.
Score: +2.8 angered throttler
- For Boomsta's vote-rigging is sub-par at best. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- For The bastard not only does the cliched "self-for" in an insulting nomination while talking in the third person, he also took two tries to properly remove Squiggle's patriotic right to participate in the democratic process that is otherwise known as voting. What kind of incompetent bastard is this? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Armageddon
Score: +1
- For. - Suits me Feb 5, 18:54
Another choice of some kind
Score: 0
- Nom. I can't believe he hasn't won this yet, etc. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Against no double negatives
Score: -???
Against. people being against not having double negatives. This is getting awfully confusing, isn't it? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:38, Feb 5
- Really? I find that this isn't not getting confusing. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)