Forum:A new idea to further parody wikipedia

Forums: Index > Village Dump > A new idea to further parody wikipedia

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6486 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Okay, so on wikipedia, you'll often find obsessively posted everywhere a little blue link on pages that say (citation needed). When you click on that link, it leads [[1]] there. Is there some way we can parody this? Maybe A: fill the uncyclopedia page on wikipedia with a ton of(citation needed)s? Or maybe have a link that says (citation not needed, bugger off) that links to a page on how not to cite anything? Just a few ideas, take or leave em. User:Mrthejazz/sig 01:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

These already exist: Template:cn and Template:Fact. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure? --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Of course.

--General Insineratehymn 02:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I have a better idea

Let's just stop caring about Wikipedia and do our own thing. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I think we've been doing that for a while now. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiwho? 02:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, the online Encyclopedia full of opinions instead of facts that anyone can edit provided the edits are approved by the Wikipedia Thought Police or else the articles get reverted quickly and the user is cussed out on their talk page. Most people and the average readers of Wikipedia cannot tell the difference between opinions and facts anyway, and opinions that are cited to web sites that hold the same opinions are treated as facts anyway. Only opinions allowed by the Thought Police are kept, and the other opinions not approved get reverted or deleted. Jimbo "Big Brother" Wales appoints people who hold the same opinions as himself to the Thought Police to monitor and control articles. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Y'know, this is actually an exceptionally accurate description of what goes on there. I may have to print it out and frame it!  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead, add it to the Wikipedia article if you must. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Interestingly enough, whoever is squatting on the domain name "wikiwho.com" is asking $50,000.00 USD for it now. I knew I shouldn't have let that one lapse two years ago... Dang!  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikiwho sounds like a euphemism for crotch.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Dammit Modus, get your little finger out of my wikiwho. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Let me be the first to say, "Ick!". Also, I'm missing a mitten. Aw, heck...you keep it.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, okay then. I didn't know that. But does anybody USE those templates? I mean, I see what you're getting at with the whole do our own thing way of life, but isn't part of our job to mercilessly parody wikipedia until Jimbo Wales cries? Just sayin'. Yeah beavith, wikiwho. User:Mrthejazz/sig 22:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Unpossible! Jimbo Wales might be a sociopath and does not suffer and thus might not be able to cry. Either that or he is the type into those weird S&M stuff like dressing up like Shirley Temple and spanking himself with a hockey stick when no one is looking. Only he forgot to turn off his webcam a few times and we noticed it. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)