File talk:Octagon-warning.png

I have uploaded a new version of this image, that HAS information. Who likes it better? 99Hello3 23:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The one you want has fucked-up transparency. --General Insineratehymn 23:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

No, it HAS a transparent bakcground. 99Hello3 23:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

But the one you want looks like shit. --General Insineratehymn 23:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

In your opinion. 99Hello3 23:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

How can you think that it looks bad when the one you want has no shading? 99Hello3 23:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Take a vote on it in the village dump. I guaruntee your version will have little support. --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

23:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

It has shading. Are you too daft to see that? --General Insineratehymn 23:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

But not good shading. 99Hello3 23:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm supporting the version you are supporting, Inserteratehymn... --~

Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

23:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Fine, have your opinion then. 99Hello3 23:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

As do I, as before. I say we protect this image like we did with StopHand, don't ban the guy, and nom him tomorrow for UGotM. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, he will be June's UGotM. --General Insineratehymn 23:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm supporting Insineratehymn's. NOW STOP BITCHING. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)