User talk:Cajek is a big ol' doofus

Welcome!

Hello, Cajek is a big ol' doofus, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, ask an administrator on their talk page or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join. Again, welcome!  -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Good day sir

Please excuse the interruption, I just wondered if I could gauge you opinion on something... From what I can tell you pretty much designed the current Pee Review system, and so thought your views were very relevant to what I'm doing currently. Basically, cajek and I are trying to improve the quality of Pee review a little. You may have read our new version of the Pee-Review Guidelines... We feel that although many people give reviews which are useful some simply give scores for each category with no indication of where the scores came from, with no suggestions as to how the article could be improved. We are really trying to encourage people to say a little more in Pee Reviews... As you a member of such large size I wondered if you might consider giving your opinion on the template which we have created...

	Hey, I don't mean to be a dick but...
	I noticed that you had done a Pee Review of MrN Has unusually large reproductive organs. Thank you. I was wondering if you could let me know why you had given your scores, and also wondered if you had any suggestions for how the article might be improved. Would you please consider giving another review? Thanks!

User:MrN9000/BoxyThings/ChilledOutDribble

Basically we are suggesting that it's an alternative to the golden shower award. To be used as a polite way of asking someone who has done a particularly poor pee review to consider doing it again...

What do you think? Is this a good thing? MrN 01:50, Dec 15

uh, I'm sorry, but I hate not only that template, but EVERYTHING. Could you please make this template more for us doofuses? I want Oscar Wilde on there, along with some pron. I like pron. --Cajek is a big ol' doofus