| Article: Welcome to Biscathorpe!
|
Score: -3 stuffs
|
| Nominated by:
|
~ Readmesoon
|
For: 1
|
- Self nom and for. I got a review, a good one, too. I fixed it up, and I believe it is good. ~ Readmesoon
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. per Cajek Mnb'z 05:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Not ready - not bad, but still needs work. That pee was somewhat overenthusiastic, I have to say. Maybe request another one from a PEEING member such as the on-fire Saberwolf116 down there? --UU - natter
 12:05, May 19
- Against. Needs more love. T. (talk) 12:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Against. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:56, May 19
|
| Comments
|
- Don't forget to add the title of the article to the "| article=" line next time you nominate things. It's lonely without titles. It's already on the anti-depressants. Also, link to PEE review? --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
It's here. Not a very good review, though. Saberwolf116 00:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 Abstain. OOooohhh- eeerrr- mmmmmm- nnnnnn- First of all, you say you got a good review in your self-vote, then you say it's not a very good review in your comment. Second, why not just call the article Biscathorpe? Third, it's written in that awkward second person style. Fourth, I felt like I was being force-fed the town... and the town wouldn't take "no" for an answer. Oh well, abstain. Le Cejak • <1:55 May 19, 2009>
- That was my comment, BTW. Saberwolf116 02:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry RMS! Le Cejak • <2:12 May 19, 2009>
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Abstain. OOooohhh- eeerrr- mmmmmm- nnnnnn- 