Uncyclopedia:VFH/The Rescuers

Article: The Rescuers	Score: -2.5
Nominated by:	Spıke ¬ 20:24 13-Nov-10 20:24, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
For: 1	Not a nom (invalid self-nom; someone else nom if you agree). I got a request last January, from one of our perennial vandals, while he was banned, to rewrite this article. I chose the theme of unrealism, before and after Disney's shameless adaptation of this children's book into a movie. But the requestor was attached to his old theme (anal rape) and has tirelessly tried to bull his own text back into place, under a dozen sockpuppets, most recently earlier today. This article is feature-good and has a narration. There is no urgency to feature it--except to flip this kid the bird. Spıke ¬ 20:24 13-Nov-10 Nom+For. Next time, Spike, you might want to ask someone on their talkpage if they'd like to nom it for you. It's a lot more eligible than your not-a-nom way of doing it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:23, 14 November 2010
Against: 3.5	Against. Just an article for an excuse to post the infamous nude woman in the mirror frame 137.159.95.30 00:04, November 14, 2010 (UTC) Against. It's rather short and it didn't really amuse me. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:35, November 14, 2010 (UTC) Against. Unfortunately, I don't really think this is ready. Not so much that it's short, but it just needs polishing - it doesn't flow as well as it could and many of the jokes just sort of fall flat. Perhaps put it through a review for specifics? Get someone competent to do it and it could really help. ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101115 - 03:45 (UTC) Against. It's OK, I guess, but it's not pushing many of my buttons. --UU - natter 17:10, Nov 15
Comments	hits SPIKE over the head with a frying pan I can't be arsed. ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101113 - 20:29 (UTC) Comment. ~~If it's not a Nom then vote on what?~~ Sorry, it is a nom, by Socky. And Spike could self nom if there was an attempt at Pee review. But valid Nom it is. I took the time to listen to the narration, and it was just, honestly, corny...works okay for some wise-guy Unnews, but sounds childish in an article. And there is very little substance in spite of so many edits. I checked the history, which is 50 times longer than the short article. But I'm not voting against Spike. So abstain. Funny bony 06:28, Nov 14 06:28, November 14, 2010 (UTC) And funnier, for that matter. Hells, can we feature a changelog? ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101114 - 06:31 (UTC) The article was complete in February; virtually everything in the history since then is the aforementioned vandal. Spıke ¬ 08:53 14-Nov-10 Abstain. I have tried to like this, moved enough to make a minor caption change but though it's a decent enough re-rewrite/tidy up , the article doesn't engage me though to vote in favour. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 07:28, November 15, 2010 (UTC)