From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Godfather Part II
|
Score: 11 burning oranges
|
| Nominated by:
|
Matfen 23:14, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 11
|
- NomFor. Goddamn I'm being charitable this week. 2 noms that aren't for my own stuff? Anyway, I find this article really funny. Even if you haven't seen the Godfather, you may appreciate this for what it is on the side: a parody of that nerd you knew at highschool who wanted to blow the teacher. And not a female nerd, either. --Matfen 23:14, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This article is really good and deserves the front page. --User:Noahlikescakeandpie 18:25, January 23, 2010 (UTC-5:00)
- For - Before reading it I assumed it would be boring a cliché. I was wrong. -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works 23:56, Jan. 24, 2010
- For. Thanks to Matfen for the nom and some formatting help. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 11:28, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Flour Yeah, I tried not to like it 'cause this guy, Dark Crane or Shadowed Pelican or whatever, he paid a guy to whack my Anne Hathaway nom, but I read it, did you read it?, I did, and it's funny, the best article ever, and now if this movie he's talking about ever comes out on DVD I'll see it. Louie the Lip 25 Jan. MMX
- For. This is pretty much made of win. --UU - natter
 12:45, Jan 25
- For per above. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:25, 25 January 2010
 Weak Bless Some of the captions are just "eh," and the character section kinda threw me, but funny overall.- For. The awesome kid reviewing style just about works though sometimes he sounds a bit too knowing. Anyway, you have my vote !
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:22, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
 For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:20, January 26, 2010 (UTC)- For. Sure, Funnybony 16:42, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Weak Bless Some of the captions are just "eh," and the character section kinda threw me, but funny overall.
For.--
20:39, January 26, 2010 (UTC)