Uncyclopedia:VFH/Oedipus Rex Rides Again

Article: Oedipus Rex Rides Again	Score: 1
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:34, 28 November 2009
For: 4	Nom+For. An epic tale of love, hatred and tragedy and all that jazz. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:34, 28 November 2009 For. I also had terrible trouble making sense of the article, but I finally did! *Style* *Guide* 06:35, November 28, 2009 (UTC) For. *Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:03, Nov. 29, 2009 For. I do say, old chap, classic literature indeed. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 19:29, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Why does it have Oedipus Rex in it at all? There's nothing to connect him with his claim to fame. Also, it's random and poorly structured. I had trouble making sense of the article. So, no. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 05:21, Nov 28 2009 It's basically a parody of Western theater, I think. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:25, 28 November 2009 Against. Needs more Oedipus. Needs more cheesy sequel feel, not whatever this 57 act thing is. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 01:21, November 30, 2009 (UTC) Weak Against. Definite talent and reminds me of tragedy of that period, but the intro is long and the not-going anywhere maybe should go somewhere. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 07:13, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. It is not a parody! It's a mugnificent classical play! *Style* *Guide* 06:41, November 28, 2009 (UTC) Abstain. I was tempted to vote yes because this sort of humour does appeal normally but in its current state it is a classic case of over writing and chucking in every joke you can think of. End result for me is that is doesn't make a satisfactory VFH. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 11:47, November 29, 2009 (UTC) Comment. Not fair! I had three jokes more! They are in my other articles! Style Guide 11:57, November 29, 2009 (UTC) Comment. I really liked the excerpts, but didn't care for the bits before, and will have to consider my vote. Perhaps it would work better under UnScripts? --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo** 09:23, November 30, 2009 (UTC)