From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Keanu Reeves
|
Score: 13.5 philosophizers of stuff...
|
| Nominated by:
|
Matfen 22:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 13.5
|
- UnSelfNomFor. Have been procrastinating about trying to get this one featured for a while, for reasons I forget. Reeves convinced me to take a more nihilistic attitude and nominate it. "All we are is dust in the wind, dude." --Matfen 22:24, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Whoa! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:48, 28 January 2010
- Excellent.
 DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:06, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. You didn't mention he needs subtitles when on screen as he mumbles so much!
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:44, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This is actually one of my favourite uncyc articles. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 00:51, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. InMooseWeTrust 03:25, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's a little patchy in places, but there's enough good stuff in here to keep me interested. And I liked the Point Break joke in the intro. --UU - natter
 11:12, Feb 2
- For. ~
     11:23, Feb 6, 2010 11:23, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
- For. As UU says there are a couple of sections that could do with a little more work, but it made me laugh anyway. ChiefjusticeDS 11:37, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Striker2117 01:32, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For Neo and the Oracle would both vote For if they were here and were actually real people or Oracles. So how can I not? ~
4:23 18 Feb. MMX
- For--Sog1970 12:55, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I like it :-) Shinuzi Sama 04:10, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. 69.119.100.90 14:35, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- A whole slew of pee reviews and critical stuff on the article's talk page. --Matfen 22:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 Meh. While it didn't inspire lots of lols, I can see that it's well written and I did laugh at some bits. So, meh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 17:13, Jan 29 2010
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Meh. While it didn't inspire lots of lols, I can see that it's well written and I did laugh at some bits. So, meh. 
18:33, February 20, 2010 (UTC)