Uncyclopedia:VFH/Canadian Idiot

Article: Canadian Idiot	Score: -3.5
Nominated by:	Legolas 11, 8:11 September 19, 2009 (UTC)
For: 1.5	SN+F Legolas 11, 8:12 September 19, 2009 (UTC) 2. For Excellent Green Day knowledge mixed with a good article. --98.219.173.85 13:07, September 20, 2009 (UTC) 3. For Weird Al might sue. Reggie The Terrible 9:54, September 20, 2009 (UTC) 4. For Nice Job. Estaban Nabatse 10:33, September 20, 2009 (UTC) 5. For Humorous, love how the last two tracks go. Probably one of the better articles I've read so far, keep it up. CullenGirl 10:56, September 20, 2009 (UTC) 98.219.173.85 You appear to have voted four times..
Against: 5	Against. No thanks. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:49, Sep 20 Against. There's an interesting kernel of an idea here marred by poor execution. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 07:57, September 20, 2009 (UTC) Nah. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:04, 20 September 2009 Against. Some good ideas, but not even close. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:37, September 20, 2009 (UTC) Against. Had another look . Fancruft and ballot box stuffing will see this removed. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate). 15:47, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Pee Review, this being a self-nom and all, or so it would seem. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:35, 19 September 2009 Legolas: get Firefox. It'll catch most of the spelling mistakes. For grammar (and in the future, hypergrammar), you're pretty much on your own, though. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:06, September 19, 2009 (UTC) *Abstain. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 19:44, September 19, 2009 (UTC) Abstain - because, as a Canadian Idiot, the title made me laugh. But it needs a bit more. --Sog1970 18:58, September 20, 2009 (UTC) I just want to say that this is shameful. I know for a fact that this article is better than just about everything featured for the last month, and I am now convinced that veterans of Uncyclopedia simply deny the newcomers to be featured so their own subpar content can be featured. This article is the epitomy of satire and to call it lacking is either to be ignorant on the subject or to have an agenda. --Legolas11 20:23, September 20, 2009 (UTC) See my note on Matt Lobster's talk page in response to your comment there, hopefully that will explain things to you.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:33, September 20, 2009 (UTC) You know, I quite agree with you. But only on the fact that you've written a good article. I don't think it's better than any of the current features. Not in its current form at least. If you can expand the article some more and make sure it's more or less consistent, I think you might get it featured. —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:49, 20 September 2009 I honestly liked parts of it, I just thought it could be improved. Plus I don't know enough about Green Day to appreciate all of it, which explains the abstention. Also, I'm fairly new and I've had a few features but I also had my favourite article Tooth Fairy binned. It's just other people's opinions - especially elf-phobic biggots' opinions. --Sog1970 21:06, September 20, 2009 (UTC)