Forum:WTF is satire???!!!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > WTF is satire???!!!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4936 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Here's some content you bunny wunnies

I just finished reading the big five or six or whatever. And all that stuff. And the word "satire" hit my eye. WTF???!!! Like I was like I was like "Fuck!" What is it again that you want us to do? Sit ired, and then people can say we "sat ire"? Bril-fucking-liant. Forget it - if slapstick doesn't do it I will smash my head against a fucking wall and you can write your fancypants satire shit yourselves, and is this clear now FOREVER!!! Huh?!? -- Style  Guide 19:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but we don't allow content around here

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:44, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Damn straight. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Forum:The everlasting argument: satire and funniness, Forum:Are there limits to satire?, Forum:Does Uncyclopedia do satire? & part of this forum. If that doesn't answer your question, it's because I wasn't listening. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia claims to offer SPOV on everything, but as I've said before a year ago (and was promptly banned for), how can we claim to offer a satyr's point of view on everything if we don't even have an article on them? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

OK Mr. Smartpants Sockpuppet - why does it say something about putting my content somewhere when I start a new topic? Why does everything have to be so difficult? Why can't I just sit here without thinking, letting my fingers slap the keyboard at random - and the software, or whatever, translates the gibberish into a great article which then makes me a millionaire, like Bill Gates or Rockefeller Rockefeller? WHY? -- Style  Guide 08:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

You can't just let your fingers slap the keyboard at random, but you can roll your head on the keyboard. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 14:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Answer the question and screw - or forget - the technical issue. -- Style  Guide 15:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Here is the answer you have been seeking all along. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

THANKS!

I was peasantly surprised at reading the article you threw at me, indeed it answered my question - no, it didn't actually do that, but it genuinely appeared to be an answer. Like, too deep to contemplate. My brain feels washed, I'm in a state of happiness. Now I can go on with my alleged life, searching for new questions to answer with the ANSWER. -- Style  Guide 15:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Maybe I can interest you in The Answer to Life, The Universe, and Everything. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

No you can't - but if you have a place where I can pick up some meaningless questions, I can apply THE ANSWER to them and feel I'm accomplishing something. -- Style  Guide 16:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what your answer is as long as you feel good about it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Back to the original question

I didn't ask a question answerable with "Why not?" Instead, I - well, read it at the top of this forum. I don't know if it was a question, really. It was more like a statement of my intentions regarding my head and a fucking wall. It might have been both, and now I totally will not check it myself. I don't care what it was. I really don't. -- Style  Guide 17:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

This satyr is hot! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

A femail satyre? Wowzeebonkers! Now I understand why Sicklopedia is so intent on sateire! This answers my question like a bucketful of used safety margins. -- Style  Guide 09:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

OK - a couple of things about the alleged satyr. First, her dress and her tresses appear to be exactly the same hue. One minus point. Her dress looks too modern. Another minus point. Her hairdo looks too modern. Her eyebrows have been done in the idiotic 21st century fashion, as if she needed to look intelligent. Satyrs don't need to do that. She appears to be indoors - since when did they go inside? Her horns look like those of a ram - yet she's a female. She looks like she's ashamed of something - satyrs never are. Conclusion: THIS IS NOT SATIRE! You tried to fool me - prepare to be punished. -- Style  Guide 09:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

What the fuck are talking about? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

You will find out when the time comes. Meanwhile, read it again - and confess I'm right. -- Style  Guide 11:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

You're so horribly wrong. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Come on, we both know you're just stalling to find a way to avoid my horrible revengery. -- Style  Guide 12:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

It looks like monotone anime or manga to me. A cheap pin-up with 2 color printing for the 13 year old dufus. Push-pins extra, in lieu of scotch tape of course. --Extra Ordinary 04:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Exciting new turns in our exciting new topic

go eat shit fuckers --CrabPope 11:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Do you mean "Go eat, shit fuckers", "Go, eat shit fuckers" or "Go eat shit, fuckers"? I've told you a million times to try and be more clear, haven't I? -- Style  Guide 11:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Now THAT'S satire. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

What I found most fascinating was the way in which it juxtaposed its world-changing message with a terse, almost Buddhist chant-like, delivery. Very rarely do such a small number of words cause such a tectonic shift in the paradigm of language. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

You don't mean tectonic shit do you? -- Style  Guide 05:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I just remembered...

I meant FTW is satire???!!! and not the way it is now. This discussion has been pointless, yes I know, I mean even more so. -- Style  Guide 05:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Satire is irony, sarcasm, or caustic wit used to attack or expose folly, vice, or stupidity. --Docile hippopotamus 09:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

This entire thread has been irony deficient, sarcasm challenged, bereft of wit and is nothing more than indulgence in folly and stupidity.--    10:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I second that motion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I wish through all this lack of smartyness I could see the light - but no. <insert name here> is the only one who really understands me. I meant to start whining but I cannot hit the note now. Thanks all for participating! -- Style  Guide 11:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

1. --<<>> 22:13, April 30, 2010 (UTC)