Forum:Does "I spent 4 hours on these" mean NOTHING to you people?
I spent FOUR HOURS making my Garfield cartoons up to snuff for you people and they got deleted again. OH MY FUCKING GOD. You have no hearts. How the fuck is Garfield eating loudly and then saying he's eating Jon's shit funny? How does the very very shittily photoshopped Garfield Goatse image stay but mine don't? I made an EFFORT on these. Fuck you twice with something long hard and sandpapery. Fuck you ALL. Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff.. 23:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Did you ever think that maybe Ljlego, who removed them, might have been the person to talk to about this, instead of posting in the forums? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:57, Mar 2
- Where they attached to an article? Sometimes unattached images get nuked? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- They were on Garfield, which has some text on it that says "please no more cartoons," or something to that effect. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:19, Mar 3
- Kat, I would expect you to know better than to run to the Dump with all your problems. 'Sup with that? Frlz, yo. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:35 Mar 3
- Yes, I certainly am the person to whom you should have come to relate your problems. But, as you didn't, I will just say to you here what I would have said there:
- They're not deleted. They still exist.
- There are just too damn many of them. It's getting to a point where they hurt to look at.
- I don't know if there's a "no more comics" message on the article, but I do know that there should be.
- If you would like, I imagine that there's quite an audience for Garfield/example on wheels! or some such. That way we could get your images onwiki.
- If you think there are images there that are unsuitable for the article, by all means remove them. Just make sure that it's merit and not spite that guides your efforts.
- In the future, talk pages are the way to go.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I certainly am the person to whom you should have come to relate your problems. But, as you didn't, I will just say to you here what I would have said there:
- Kat, I would expect you to know better than to run to the Dump with all your problems. 'Sup with that? Frlz, yo. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:35 Mar 3
- They were on Garfield, which has some text on it that says "please no more cartoons," or something to that effect. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:19, Mar 3
- Where they attached to an article? Sometimes unattached images get nuked? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
I have a stupid question. If there are too many Garfield images, why not use the <choose> tag so that we just don't have to look at so many of them at once? I would have to agree with the hack that his images are much better than the garfield goatse.--<<>> 03:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- *her-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- The Garfield Goatse was also a dance, popular during the short reign of the President of the same name. Yes, there was a President Goatse. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Means something to me anyway. I've taken Brad's suggestion and put the comics into a choose tag, so we should only get 6 at once, but all get an equal amount of airtime. As it were. Except for Garfreakeld.png which is one of the most awesome images in existence. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:07, 03 Mar 2008
- I've had nightmares like that. Hold me. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh god. I printed that one out like 2,000 times and put it all over my brother's room when he was asleep. He's...never been the same. I miss Nick. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 16:34 Mar 3
- I think I'm going to take that one out of the choose tag, because it really is one of the best images of all time.--<<>> 00:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh wait, you'd already done that. I'm uh, gonna go do something "useful" now...--<<>> 00:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sweet. and FOR THE LOVE OF GOOD I'M A GIRL! A GIRL!!!!!!! Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff.. 01:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is the internet. There are no girls. They're all outside, brushing ponies manes, or something. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Tee hee, way ahead of you! It's one of my favourite images ever too. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:46, 05 Mar 2008
- Sweet. and FOR THE LOVE OF GOOD I'M A GIRL! A GIRL!!!!!!! Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff.. 01:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh god. I printed that one out like 2,000 times and put it all over my brother's room when he was asleep. He's...never been the same. I miss Nick. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 16:34 Mar 3
Are all of these cartoons really your own work?
I couldn't help but notice that some of the images Heck no Techno uploaded are from the "Garfield minus Garfield" website. HnT, I do hope you're not trying to pass someone else's work off as your own, that's not cool. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Garfield Minus Garfield, yes, are not mine. (But those aren't the images I ever said I made.) I should have been more specific: I ADDED Garfield Minus Garfield, but did not MAKE them. The rest of the ones I added, I DID make. Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff.. 21:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, I didn't mean to throw any accusations at anyone. I just have a duty to check if it seems that there's been any irregularities regarding copyright/legitimacy. No worries. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I would have put a...whatever you wanna call it about copyright when I uploaded it, but from my knowledge those seem to serve no purpose anyway, so...Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff.. 21:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, I didn't mean to throw any accusations at anyone. I just have a duty to check if it seems that there's been any irregularities regarding copyright/legitimacy. No worries. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)