| Article: The Wurzels
|
Score: 3 hay-chewing bumpkins
|
| Nominated by:
|
Geoffprickett 12:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 6
|
- Self for & Nom Geoffprickett 12:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- for. i liked this, despite having no idea what the hell a 'wurzel' is. too many rogue punchlines, though. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. I found it humORous to the max, even though I have no idea who these peole are. Le Cejak • <21:05 Oct 08, 2008>
- Weak for • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:05, Oct 9
- For MrN
 20:39, Oct 10
- Weak For. Not bad. I'll give it support though.
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  20:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. Sir Severian
  (Sprich mit mir!)  17:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Against. I'm a fan of wurzels and i love the idea of them havin an article. I just don't think this is particularly well done. i do like the idea that ur parodying other "family" type bands where they all have the same stage surname, maybe u can have danny wurzel as a parody of danny filth from cradle of filth, and have a ramone guy aswell. Also, was this even peed? --ScottBurnan 19:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 What the fuck? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:54 Oct 09, 2008
|
| Comments
|
No, Scott, it was not peed, but had been on offer for over a week. Geoffprickett 20:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain. Liked some of it. Not so keen on other bits. Patchy really, although I'd like to see it smoothed out enough to vote for. --UU - natter
 10:20, Oct 13
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
What the fuck? 
