Uncyclopedia:VFH/MythBusters

Article: MythBusters	Score: -0.5 busted balls
Nominated by:	66.194.217.222 17:41, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
For: 5.5	For. 66.194.217.222 17:41, January 12, 2010 (UTC) For. 66.194.217.221 17:43, January 12, 2010 (UTC) You can only vote once! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:54, 12 January 2010 For. Pretty good, actually. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:54, 12 January 2010 Weak Bless Funny, but ditch the Norris thing, and avoid any in-jokes. The Paramore picture fit great. - ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 23:53,12January,2010 For. It made me laugh all the way through so I for one am not sure how you could improve it. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 00:35, January 13, 2010 (UTC) For: Definitely some funny shit. The Humbled Master 03:33, January 13, 2010 (UTC) For. Though I think all those who have voted against do have a point about some aspects of this story and perhaps the need of some judicial editing, I still think it can be featured as it is. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 23:39, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 6	Mild Against. I went back and forth on this article more than just about any article I can remember. Some parts I really liked, but some parts I really disliked. Here's what I hope happens: it fails VFH. It gets Pee Reviewed. It gets improved. It gets nommed again. I vote for it and it wins VFH. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 21:31, January 12, 2010 (UTC) Enthusiastic for a Later For! I agree with Sarge at Arms/WhyTF?, it's extremely good with potential of being extremely great! This is the first time I've voted against something for the purpose of wanting to see it improved into possibly one of the "best articles of the year" status. Someone may need to adopt the page and fly with it.Aleister in Chains 4th of never, MMX Againsting out of Love. Basically what the two esteemed gentlemen above me said - take this down, get rid of the garbage, and renom it quick! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 08:41, Jan 13 2010 Against. As above really, a review or at least a bit more work is in order. ChiefjusticeDS 23:45, January 13, 2010 (UTC) Against. Some of it is great, but the rest of it is a relentless torrent of puerile, uncreative sex jokes. pillow talk 03:08, January 14, 2010 (UTC) Against. what Hyperbole said Mn-z 16:20, January 14, 2010 (UTC)