From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Lord Christopher Monckton
|
Score: 10 denial deniers
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony    00:05, Oct 18
|
For: 10
|
- For. Much better after lessons learned Funnybony 00:06, Oct 18 00:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. With added sharpe satire!
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:14, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 For. I liked it last time. --Sog1970 13:46, October 18, 2010 (UTC)- For. The enviro-communists! They're coming! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:40, 19 October 2010
- For. Oh, very well. I guess. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 03:02 (UTC) 03:02, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I make no secret that I'm a total MrN9000 mark and I think this is some of his best stuff. Where is that guy anyway? MadMax 08:41, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Whaaaaaaaaa? MadMax voted on VFH? This article must be good. I actually am on the fence about global warming (not about the horrors of deforestation though) and read both sides. Yet this page is good satire about a pompous arse who would probably post it in his electronic scrapbook. Aleister 10:38 19 10
- For. Although I enjoyed the Denial article itself more for some reason. Anyway, this has had it a long time coming. --Matfen 20:29, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A sort of repellent bog creature with enormous sums of cash. And oh dear batbuggering Lord, WHERE IS THAT PHOTO FROM? - David Gerard 19:22, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I seem to recall voting on this before, it still has my approval. -- Sf13
 2053 EST 20 Oct, 2010
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
This almost made it, and was Quasi-Featured Article (15 June 2010). Since then a lot of improvements. Hope the old voters still get a kick out of it, and the new voters too.--Funnybony 00:05, Oct 18
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
00:05, Oct 18
For. I liked it last time. --
18:58, October 21, 2010 (UTC)