Talk:Old McDonald

Richardson j 22:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Great :-> o-o Richardson j 22:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Old McDonald

Not my article, but I want to see if someone else found this as funny as I did before I put it on VFH. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	8	There are some really funny parts in here. It's a little long, with some parts that don't really have any laughs. But on the whole it's a funny article.
Concept:	9	Excellent idea.
Prose and formatting:	10	No complaints here.
Images:	5	Meh. Not really any "hilarious" pictures here. The first couple ones are the best. The last two are only marginally related and don't really add anything to the article.
Miscellaneous:	9
Final Score:	41	On the whole, it's a very funny article. The best thing you could do for this article would be shortening it. There's just some stuff in here that isn't all that funny, and that drags down the article as a whole
Reviewer:	--THE 20:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

How about that. I was just about to put my own article on pee review and found it's already up here. If someone could specify what bits need trimming, then I can make the improvements. Thanks. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking of the "young mcdonald" and "later life" sections, I believe. They aren't terrible, but they are a little slow compared to what comes later on. --THE 19:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Sad

Poor Terry *Sniff* What a heartless monster. --I like cheese 23:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)